1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-328x(00)80841-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal structure of dicyclopentadienylvanadium monochloride and its implications for the structures of other d2 dicyclopentadienyl compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviations of the aromatic ligand planes from parallel orientations increase on Lewis base coordination, to 33.0° for Zr(C 7 H 7 )(C 5 H 4 SiMe 3 )(THF) and 31° for Zr(C 7 H 7 )(C 5 H 5 ){CN[2,6-C 6 H 3 (CH 3 ) 2 ]}. The closely related angles between the M−centroid vectors are 148.9° and 149.3°, respectively, which seem somewhat large relative to complexes such as V(C 5 H 5 ) 2 Cl (139.5°), which may be attributed to the previously discussed closeness of the C 7 H 7 ligand to the metal. This close approach is also likely responsible for greater angles between the M−C 7 H 7 centroids and the THF or isocyanide ligands (113.9° and 112.7°), as compared to the corresponding angles involving the Cp ligand (97.1° and 98.0°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The deviations of the aromatic ligand planes from parallel orientations increase on Lewis base coordination, to 33.0° for Zr(C 7 H 7 )(C 5 H 4 SiMe 3 )(THF) and 31° for Zr(C 7 H 7 )(C 5 H 5 ){CN[2,6-C 6 H 3 (CH 3 ) 2 ]}. The closely related angles between the M−centroid vectors are 148.9° and 149.3°, respectively, which seem somewhat large relative to complexes such as V(C 5 H 5 ) 2 Cl (139.5°), which may be attributed to the previously discussed closeness of the C 7 H 7 ligand to the metal. This close approach is also likely responsible for greater angles between the M−C 7 H 7 centroids and the THF or isocyanide ligands (113.9° and 112.7°), as compared to the corresponding angles involving the Cp ligand (97.1° and 98.0°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The best known bonding model for bent metallocenes is due to Lauher−Hoffmann; Figure shows the metallocene orbitals with two different coordinate systems. The coordinate system used here, due to Petersen and Dahl, is more convenient because this coordinate system minimizes the mixing the d z 2 and d x 2 - y 2 orbitals. , This metallocene bonding model is supported by the work of Petersen and Dahl in which single-crystal EPR spectroscopy shows that the single electron in (η 5 -MeC 5 H 4 ) 2 VCl 2 and Cp 2 VS 5 occupies an orbital that is perpendicular to the plane formed by the metal and the two Cp centroids and is largely of d z 2 parentage (in this coordinate system). , In Cp* 2 TiX, the unpaired electron resides in the low-lying a 1 orbital which is largely d z 2 . The empty b 2 orbital can interaction with the p z orbital of the X ligand to form a π-bond and a π-antibond; the latter is the b 2 orbital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The anion of unsubstituted manganocene has not been detected,40 but that of bis(j75-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)manganese has been. 47 The general shape of Table III is triangular, peaking at the d6 configuration known to be so stable in metal compounds. £ 1 /2 values for the ^M1 reductions were shown21 to correlate with the second metal ionization potentials for = Cr, V, Co, and Ni.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%