1956
DOI: 10.1107/s0365110x56000267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal structure of formamidoxime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Grafting of acrylic monomers with starch or cellulose has been reported where the mechanism of grafting is free radical initiation reactions (Hall and Llewellyn 1956;Agrawal 1979). Recently, an alternative reaction pathway of cellulose units, with primarily -OH groups, has been proposed (O'Connell et al 2006).…”
Section: Graft Copolymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grafting of acrylic monomers with starch or cellulose has been reported where the mechanism of grafting is free radical initiation reactions (Hall and Llewellyn 1956;Agrawal 1979). Recently, an alternative reaction pathway of cellulose units, with primarily -OH groups, has been proposed (O'Connell et al 2006).…”
Section: Graft Copolymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal structure of formamide oxime, N-hydroxymethanimidamide, iso-uretin, HON.CH.NH2, was determined by Hall & Llewellyn (1956) and refined by Hall (1965) using X-ray diffraction room-temperature data. This neutron diffraction refinement at 16 K has been carried out to provide more precise molecular structure data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The N2-O2 distance is slightly longer than distances observed in the nitrate ion (1.218-1.268 A) (Grison, Eriks & deVries, 1950;Sass, Vidale & Donohue, 1957;Hamilton, 1957) or in XNO2 species (1.202-1.23 ,/k), X=F, C1 (Clayton, Williams & Weatherly, 1959;Smith & Magnusson, 1952) which suggests slightly less than an N--O double bond. The C3-N2 distance is marginally less than double-bond distances in formamidoxime (Hall & Llewellyn, 1956) and just larger than the Pauling value of 1.287 A (Pauling, 1960). There is some conjugation to C3-C4 ..,o reflected in the slightly shortened C3-C4 distance of 1.492 (4) ,/k compared to the single-bond value above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%