Neutrophil proteinase 3 (Pr3) and elastase (NE) may cause lung tissue destruction in emphysema and cystic fibrosis. These serine proteinases have similar P 1 specificities. We have compared their catalytic activity using acyl-tetrapeptide-p-nitroanilides, which occupy the S 5 -S 1 subsites of their substrate binding site, and intramolecularly quenched fluorogenic heptapeptides, which bind at S 5 -S 4 . Most p-nitroanilide substrates are turned over slowly by Pr3 as compared with NE. These differences disappear with the fluorogenic heptapeptides, some of which are hydrolyzed even faster by Pr3 than by NE. Elongation of substrates strongly increases the catalytic efficiency of Pr3, whereas it has little effect on NE catalysis. These different sensitivities to S-P interactions show that Pr3 and NE are not interchangeable enzymes despite their similar P 1 specificity.The azurophilic granules of polymorphonuclear neutrophils contain three serine proteinases: elastase (NE), 1 cathepsin G, and proteinase 3 (Pr3), which participate in lysosomal bacterial digestion and neutrophil migration through the extracellular matrix at sites of inflammation. These enzymes are ϳ30-kDa glycoproteins, which belong to the chymotrypsin family of serine proteinases. Pr3 is the most recently discovered, the most difficult to isolate, and hence the less well studied proteinase of the three. It is identical to three independently discovered proteins: (i) myeloblastin, which regulates the growth and differentiation of leukemic cells; (ii) p29b, which has microbicidal activity; and (iii) the target antigen of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies detected in patients with Wegner's granulomatosis (2). Pr3 cleaves extracellular matrix proteins including elastin, type IV collagen, fibronectin, laminin, and vitronectin (3, 4). It is able to produce lung emphysema in hamsters (3), and thus, in concert with NE and cathepsin G, it may be responsible for lung tissue destruction occurring in emphysema and cystic fibrosis.Although many model substrates have been used to map the active site of NE (5-8), literature on the substrate specificity and the catalytic activity of Pr3 is poorly documented. Fuginaga et al. (9) have shown that the two enzymes have similar substrate binding sites. This explains why both proteinases cleave the oxidized insulin A and B chains at peptide bonds involving small aliphatic amino acid residues (4). The specificity of Pr3 for non-bulky residues has been confirmed with a limited number of model substrates (4, 10 -12). As a rule, these substrates were turned over at a much lower rate by Pr3 than by NE, an unexplained observation. We have undertaken the present work to understand this puzzling finding.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESMaterials-NE was isolated, and active site was titrated as described previously (13). Pr3 came from Athens Research Technology (Athens, GA) and was titrated with ␣ 1 -proteinase inhibitor (4). This enzyme preparation was electrophoretically pure. The presence of NE was tested by reacting 0.14 M Pr3 wi...