1971
DOI: 10.1107/s0567740871003960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal structures of monoclinic 5-ethylbarbituric acid and 5-hydroxy-5-ethylbarbituric acid

Abstract: The crystal data for the two forms of 5-ethylbarbituric acid (EBA) are (I) monoclinic (m.p. 194--196°), a= 11.151, b =6.838, c= 9.536 A, fl= 92°21 ', space groupP2)/c with four, molecules per cell; (II)triclinic (m.p. 142-145 ), a=6.018, b= 5.344, c= 12.121/~, ~=93 38, fl= 105 42, ),=94 19, space group P1 or PT with two molecules per cell. The crystal structure of (I) is reported together with that of the oxidation product 5-hydroxy-5-ethylbarbituric acid (HEBA) which is monoclinic (m.p. 207-209°), a= 10.088, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, is 1.230 (7)A which is close to that of 1.220 A in barbiturates (Gatehouse & Craven, 1971) and the value in International Tables for X- (iii) Molecular packing Significant non-bonded interactions are given in Table 7 where those listed are not more than 0.3 A longer than those given by Pauling (1960) and by Bondi (1964). Fig.…”
Section: (I) Molecular Conformationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…, is 1.230 (7)A which is close to that of 1.220 A in barbiturates (Gatehouse & Craven, 1971) and the value in International Tables for X- (iii) Molecular packing Significant non-bonded interactions are given in Table 7 where those listed are not more than 0.3 A longer than those given by Pauling (1960) and by Bondi (1964). Fig.…”
Section: (I) Molecular Conformationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Crystal structure (a) Barbituric acids 5,5-Diethylbarbituric acid (barbital), form I (Craven, Vizzini & Rodrigues, 1969) Barbital, form II (Craven, Vizzini & Rodrigues, 1969) Barbital, form IV (Craven & Vizzini, 1971) 5-Ethyl-5-isoamylbarbituric acid (amobarbital), form I 2-89 Amobarbital, form II 2.91, 2.86 5-Ethyl-5-(3,3-dimethylbutyl)barbitutic acid (Gartland & Craven, 1971) 2.82 5-Ethyl-5-(1-methylbutenyl)barbituric acid (Craven & Cusatis, 1969) 2.87, 2.92 5-Ethyl-5-butylbarbituric acid (Bideau, 1971) 2.86 5-Ethyl-5-(1-cyclohexen-l-yl)barbituric acid (Bideau & Artaud, 1970) 2.87 5-Ethyl-5-(1-cyciohepten-l-yl)barbituric acid (Bideau, Leroy & Housty, 1969) 2"89, 2.87 5-Ethyl-5-phenylbarbituric acid, form III (Williams, 1974) 2.89, 2-91 5-Methyl-5-phenylbarbituric acid (Bravic, Housty & Bideau, 1968) 2.90 5-Ethylbarbituric acid (Gatehouse & Craven, 1971) 2.85 (b) 1-Methylbarbituric acids 1-Methyl-5,5-diethylbarbituric acid (Wunderlich, 1973) 2"84 1-Methyl-5-ethyl-5-(l-cyclohexen-l-yl)barbituric acid (Bideau, Leroy & Housty, 1970) 2"88 1-Methyl-5-ethyl-5-phenylbarbituric acid (Bideau, Marly & Housty, 1969) 2.89 (c) Barbiturate anions Sodium barbital (Berking & Craven, 1971) 2.84 Calcium barbital trihydrate (Berking, 1972) Guanidinium barbital dihydrate (McClure & Craven, 1973) (Craven & Gartland, 1970) 2.98, 2.94, 2.93 -5,5-Diethylbarbituric acid/aminopyrine (1 : 1) (Kiryu, 1971) 2.82 2"75 5,5-Diethylbarbituric acid/urea (1:1) (This paper) -2.78, 2-80 5,5-Diethylbarbituric acid/acetamide) (1:1) (Hsu & Craven, 1974a) -2"82, 2-82 5-Ethyl-5-isoamylbarbituric acid/salicylamide (1 : 1) (Hsu & Craven, 1974b) 2.92 -5,5-Diethylbarbituric acid/imidazole (1:1) (Hsu & Craven, 1974c) 2.91 - The shortest reported distances which we could find were 2-55/~ in cysteylglycine sodium iodide (Dyer, 1951) and 2.621~ in guanine hydrochloride monohydrate (Broomhead, 1951). Since these structure determinations were based only on zonal X-ray intensity data, a more reliable lower limit for N...O distances might be 2.67 A which occurs in the urea/ parabanic acid complex …”
Section: The Hydrogen Bondingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) also unconventionally orients the NHs syn to the gem-dimethyl group, leaving the C(18) and C (19) methyls buttressed against one another. The apparently shortened sp 3 -sp 3 bonds of the ethyl ester groups are ascribed to the neglect of the relatively large thermal motion, as seen in the ethyl groups of 2 [13] and in certain ethyl-barbituric acid derivatives [21]. As in 2, the two pyrrole rings of 1 are virtually equivalent with respect to bond lengths and bond angles (Fig.…”
Section: Configuration and Overall Conformationmentioning
confidence: 94%