2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20174749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CSP-Based New Features Plus Non-Convex Log Sparse Feature Selection for Motor Imagery EEG Classification

Abstract: The common spatial pattern (CSP) is a very effective feature extraction method in motor imagery based brain computer interface (BCI), but its performance depends on the selection of the optimal frequency band. Although a lot of research works have been proposed to improve CSP, most of these works have the problems of large computation costs and long feature extraction time. To this end, three new feature extraction methods based on CSP and a new feature selection method based on non-convex log regularization a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence the authors hope to establish a robust decoder for real-time motor imagery training with feedbacks. In future investigations, comparison with other feature selection methods or combination with optimization methods [26,27,29] while minimizing computation cost should be carried out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence the authors hope to establish a robust decoder for real-time motor imagery training with feedbacks. In future investigations, comparison with other feature selection methods or combination with optimization methods [26,27,29] while minimizing computation cost should be carried out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first method, because frequency information is obtained via a time-frequency analysis, the EEG signals of each channel must be decomposed, which involves numerous calculations and takes considerable computation time. The second method is challenging to implement and effortlessly leads to local solutions [29]. The drawback of the fourth method is the requirement of a lengthy training phase of models, which is insufficient for practical BCI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed feature extraction method, the proposed method is compared with the other four CSP methods, which are the traditional CSP method [6,19], CSP-FB [11], SFBCSP [9], SBLFB [10], and CSP-LBP [7]. If there is no special instruction, the pair number of spatial filters for CSP and its improvement methods are set as follows: m � 3 for data set 1 and data set 3; m � 1 for data set 2; SVM is used for classification.…”
Section: Comparison Methods and Parameter Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e comparison algorithms and their parameter settings are as follows: CSP: CSP feature extraction refers to literature [6,19]. CSP-FB: the parameter setting of the CSP-FB algorithm refers to literature [11]. F-score-h is used to select features.…”
Section: Comparison Methods and Parameter Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparse Bayesian learning, which has been applied for feature selection in a variety of applications, has also lately attracted more interest. The decomposition of the EEG signal into several sub-bands and extraction of CSP characteristics [ 18 ]. The Bayesian learning technique is utilized to create sparse features, and the SVM classifier is then employed for classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%