2020
DOI: 10.26907/esd15.1.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cultural Internalization Scale: Assessing internal and external reasons for endorsing one’s cultural identity

Abstract: The constructs of 'culture' and 'cultural identity' have long been recognized by researchers as important, but traditionally have been treated as static properties rather than in terms of their degree and quality of internalization. Adopting the more dynamic view of internalization proposed by Vygotsky and by self-determination theory (SDT), two studies tested the measurement properties of the Cultural Internalization Scale (CIS), which assesses internal versus external reasons for endorsing one's ambient cult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such experimental work on motivational regulations continues today, with experimental work shedding light on the differential role of punishments and logical consequences (e.g., Robichaud & Mageau, 2020), the fostering of identified regulation through meaningful rationales (e.g., Jang, 2008), and the use of guilt induction to prompt introjected regulation (Chen et al, 2016). Motive states are also being identified in brain studies as these states engage different neural networks (e.g., Fang et al, 2020;Lee & Reeve, 2017, 2020Miura et al, 2017;Ryan & Di Domenico, 2016).…”
Section: Methodological Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such experimental work on motivational regulations continues today, with experimental work shedding light on the differential role of punishments and logical consequences (e.g., Robichaud & Mageau, 2020), the fostering of identified regulation through meaningful rationales (e.g., Jang, 2008), and the use of guilt induction to prompt introjected regulation (Chen et al, 2016). Motive states are also being identified in brain studies as these states engage different neural networks (e.g., Fang et al, 2020;Lee & Reeve, 2017, 2020Miura et al, 2017;Ryan & Di Domenico, 2016).…”
Section: Methodological Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The claim is that across development and cultures, satisfaction of these needs enhances, and frustration interferes with, wellness. As Lynch (2020) recently showed, the degree to which one can internalize one’s own cultural norms is important everywhere (see also Chirkov et al, 2005; Craven et al, 2016). Yet SDT simultaneously recognizes emic differences in how these basic needs are valued, voiced, and expressed in different cultural contexts (Reeve et al, 2018).…”
Section: Beyond Proximal Influences: Culture Economics and Human Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%