2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40167-018-0066-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cultural neuroscience of emotion regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, this database has norms within both the dimensional (Marchewka et al 2014) and the discrete (Riegel et al 2016) models. Recently, there has been an attempt to compare the NAPS affective ratings between Iranian and European population (Riegel et al 2017), but no differences were found between both models' ratings taking culture as its variation factor, in spite of previous studies which hypothesized the contrary (Hampton and Varnum 2016). Likewise, it has been found that affective space distribution proposed by the NAPS shows that the valence-arousal relationship can be described by a quadratic function which has a boomerang shape (Riegel et al 2016(Riegel et al , 2017 or by a linear function (Marchewka et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Also, this database has norms within both the dimensional (Marchewka et al 2014) and the discrete (Riegel et al 2016) models. Recently, there has been an attempt to compare the NAPS affective ratings between Iranian and European population (Riegel et al 2017), but no differences were found between both models' ratings taking culture as its variation factor, in spite of previous studies which hypothesized the contrary (Hampton and Varnum 2016). Likewise, it has been found that affective space distribution proposed by the NAPS shows that the valence-arousal relationship can be described by a quadratic function which has a boomerang shape (Riegel et al 2016(Riegel et al , 2017 or by a linear function (Marchewka et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For a more in depth discussion of culture and neuroplasticity, see Goh (this volume) and for a more in depth discussion of the philosophical meaning of cultural differences in neural structure and function, see Northoff (this volume). Consistent with these ideas, in the past decade, dozens of studies have indeed found differences in neural function and structure across cultural groups (Hampton & Varnum, 2018a;Han & Ma, 2014;Kim & Sasaki, 2014;Kitayama, Varnum, & Salvador, in press). For example, recent ERP studies have found that European-Americans show evidence of an implicit positivity bias for the self, whereas Chinese do not appear to show this bias (Hampton & Varnum, 2018b) and that European-Americans (and those from Mexican cultural backgrounds) are better able to intentionally up-regualte neural affective responses than people from East Asian cultural backgrounds (Varnum & Hampton, 2017;Hampton, Kwon, & Varnum, under review).…”
Section: How Have/will Our Brains Change?mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Empathizers' prior exposure to pain (Prkachin and Rocha, 2010), socioeconomic status (Varnum et al, 2015), and cultural experiences (Wang et al, 2015;Hampton and Varnum, 2018) also influence empathy and its underlying brain activities. Perceived information about social relationships between observers and empathy targets also modulates empathic neural responses such that, relative to viewing own-race or own-team individuals' pain, viewing other-race or opponent-team individuals' pain decreased empathic neural responses in the affective (e.g., ACC, AI), cognitive (e.g., mPFC, TPJ), and sensorimotor (e.g., motor cortex) nodes of the empathy network (Xu et al, 2009;Avenanti et al, 2010;Hein et al, 2010;Mathur et al, 2010;Sheng and Han, 2012;Sheng et al, 2014;2016;Han, 2018;Zhou and Han, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%