2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2016.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cuntz splice does not preserve ⁎-isomorphism of Leavitt path algebras overZ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, Theorem 1.4, in particular, algebraically differentiate Leavitt path algebras with coefficients in C respectively Z. The author feels that this differentiaton is especially interesting considering the strange behaviour of Leavitt path algebras with coefficients in Z observed by Johansen and Sørensen[18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, Theorem 1.4, in particular, algebraically differentiate Leavitt path algebras with coefficients in C respectively Z. The author feels that this differentiaton is especially interesting considering the strange behaviour of Leavitt path algebras with coefficients in Z observed by Johansen and Sørensen[18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Tomforde [26] introduced Leavitt path algebras over commutative unital rings and proved that many results carry over to his generalized setting. Leavitt path algebras over Z were considered by Johansen and Sørensen [18] in connection to the classification program of Leavitt path algebras. In this article, we follow Hazrat [17] and consider Leavitt path algebras L R (E) where R is a general, possibly non-commutative associative ring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since every unit in O n1 × · · · × O n k has isotropy group Z k and every unit in O m1 × · · · × O m l has isotropy group Z l , deduce that k = l. The adjacency matrix of the directed graph with one vertex and n edges is the 1 × 1 matrix [n]. The Bowen-Franks group associated to [n] is defined (see [25,28]) as BF([n]) = Z/(n − 1)Z. Therefore, BF([n k ]) ∼ = BF([m k ]) if and only if n k = m k .…”
Section: Tensor Products Of Leavitt Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even combinations of these restrictions (i.e., restricting both the graph and the field) yield open problems -no one knows, for example, whether L C (E 2 ) and L C (E − 2 ) are Morita equivalent, or whether L Z 2 (E 2 ) and L Z 2 (E − 2 ) are Morita equivalent. In July 2015, Johansen and Sørensen announced the preprint [11], which to the author's knowledge contain some of the first concrete results concerning the sign of the determinant condition. Although Leavitt path algebras are defined over fields, as noted by the author in [22], for any graph E and any commutative ring R it is possible to construct a Leavitt path algebra L R (E) with coefficients in R. Johansen and Sørensen proved that if we choose the coefficients to be the ring Z, then…”
Section: Classification Of Leavitt Path Algebras Of Finite Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%