1952
DOI: 10.1088/0370-1298/65/8/111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cupric Ion in a Trigonal Crystalline Electric Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

19
373
1
4

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 386 publications
(397 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
19
373
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They coincide, as obvious, with the well known data of the undoped copper acetate complex [9,10]. A specific discussion of these will, therefore, not be repeated here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They coincide, as obvious, with the well known data of the undoped copper acetate complex [9,10]. A specific discussion of these will, therefore, not be repeated here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Within the errors, the tensors g, D, and A'Cu have coincident axes. These, as known [9], are parallel to the salient molecular directions with the maximum values (z axis) along the copper-copper direction and the V ' axis lying in the crystallographic ac-plane. This information can be utilized to deduce the orienta tion of the three mutually orthogonal planes with respect to the unit cell without a preliminary orientation of the crystal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…35 The two copper ions interact, with an exchange interaction H = -2JS 1 S 2 . In this isotropic Heisenberg Hamiltonian, a negative value of J refers to an antiferromagnetic interaction within the dimer, while a positive J refers to a ferromagnetic one.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility of such systems is distinctive and may be used to distinguish antiferromagnetic coupling from a truly diamagnetic structure-e.g., a Cu(I) dimer. For two antiferromagnetically coupled S = 1/2 Cu(II) ions, the susceptibility will be a maximum at a temperature that is simply related to the energy difference, J, between the diamagnetic ground state and the paramagnetic excited state (7). Antiferromagnetic coupling between two copper ions has been observed in a wide variety of dimeric Cu(II) complexes (8) and in the four-copper derivative of bovine superoxide dismutase (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%