2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The current functional state of local neuronal circuits controls the magnitude of a BOLD response to incoming stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…dentate gyrus, hippocampus proper, subiculum, and entorhinal cortex; Fig. 2A), as has been observed and reported in previous experiments (Angenstein et al, 2010). The generated BOLD responses in the DG/hippocampus proper to successive stimulation trains differed significantly (ANOVA: F = 15.8; df = 7; p b 0.001; n rat = 8;).…”
Section: Bold Responses During Short and Long Burst Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…dentate gyrus, hippocampus proper, subiculum, and entorhinal cortex; Fig. 2A), as has been observed and reported in previous experiments (Angenstein et al, 2010). The generated BOLD responses in the DG/hippocampus proper to successive stimulation trains differed significantly (ANOVA: F = 15.8; df = 7; p b 0.001; n rat = 8;).…”
Section: Bold Responses During Short and Long Burst Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…High stimulation intensities resulted in significant fEPSP-LTP. The involvement of just a small neuronal population in the processing of the specific information, as suggested by optogenetic studies (Miesenböck 2009), may explain our results: By stimulation of a smaller number of synapses through low intensity test pulses (Angenstein et al 2010) as in our case, the higher proportion of silenced memory related synapses can reduce or even impair the observed field potential. After high-intensity stimulation, as in the Jeffery (1995) study, the silencing of these synapses is masked by potentiation of a higher number of memory-unrelated synapses, thus resulting in higher fEPSP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Whereas during low intensity stimulation, the time courses of BOLD responses were similar between all three stimulation blocks, the time courses varied during high intensity stimulation ( Figure 2C). As shown previously, the functional properties of dentate neuronal circuits change during the first high intensity stimulation trains (Angenstein et al, 2010). Consequently, the conditions that lead to BOLD responses in the second and third stimulation blocks are highly representative of this altered state.…”
Section: N-methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Inhibition Modifies the Blood supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Therefore, the magnitude of the BOLD response to these low intensity stimulation trains can be used as a comparative parameter for the BOLD response to subsequent high intensity stimulation trains. As described previously, BOLD responses to low intensity stimulation trains become reduced when high intensity stimulation trains are inserted (Angenstein et al, 2010). To check whether this effect depends on NMDA-dependent mechanisms, we added a third stimulation block containing identical low intensity stimulation trains.…”
Section: Effect Of Mk801 Applied Immediately Before Repetitive Stimulmentioning
confidence: 99%