The current state of epilepsy guidelines: A systematic review

Abstract

SUMMARYObjective: The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force, composed of 14 international members, was established in 2011 to identify, using systematic review methodology, international epilepsy clinical care guidelines, assess their quality, and determine gaps in areas of need of development. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed in six electronic databases (e.g. Medline, Embase) using a broad search strategy without initial limits to language or study design. Six gray literature databases (e.g., American Academy of Neurology [AAN], ILAE) were also searched to minimize publication bias. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, reviewed full text articles, and performed data abstraction. Descriptive statistics and a meta-analysis were generated. Results: The search identified 10,926 abstracts. Of the 410 articles selected for full text review, 63 met our eligibility criteria for a guideline. Of those included, 54 were in English and 9 were in other languages (French, Spanish, and Italian). Of all guidelines, 29% did not specify the target age groups, 27% were focused on adults, 22% included only children, and 6% specifically addressed issues related to women with epilepsy. Guidelines included in the review were most often aimed at guiding clinical practice for status epilepticus (n = 7), first seizure (n = 6), drug-resistant epilepsy (n = 5), and febrile seizures (n = 4), among others. Most of the guidelines were therapeutic (n = 35) or diagnostic (n = 16) in nature. The quality of the guidelines using a 1-7 point scale (7 = highest) varied and was moderate overall (mean = 4.99 AE 1.05 [SD]). Significance: We identified substantial gaps in topics (e.g., epilepsy in the elderly) and there was considerable heterogeneity in methodologic quality. The findings should offer a valuable resource for health professionals caring for people with epilepsy, since

Guidelines for dementia or Parkinson’s disease with depression or anxiety: a systematic review

“…In fact, few guidelines had discrete sections addressing knowledge translation. The concern about guideline applicability was explored in a 2015 systematic review [51], which found that applicability scored lower than any other domain [51, 52]. If guidelines rarely address their implementation in practice, then there will be continued practice variation.…”

“…There is a well-recognized issue with heterogeneity in the terms used to refer to guidelines [52]. For our database search we used indexed terms from each of the three databases as well as key words using known nomenclature for guidelines and the comorbidities.…”

Developing clinical practice guidelines for epilepsy: A report from the ILAE Epilepsy Guidelines Working Group

“…The literature search to identify CPG development frameworks included gray literature and hand searching of CPGs included in a previously conducted systematic review of current epilepsy CPGs published between 1985 and 2014 in any language . CPGs identified were in English, French, Spanish, and Italian in the aforementioned systematic review, and all were included and reviewed for CPG development methodology.…”

Quality indicators for the adult epilepsy monitoring unit

“…7 A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for the care of people with epilepsy did not reveal any guidelines pertaining to patient care in the EMU. 10 Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of the evidence related to quality and safety in EMUs, to guide the development of the quality indicators. 5 The systematic review of quality and safety in EMUs is described separately.…”