Currently, liver resection (LR) remains the treatment of choice for patients with technically resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC), achieving a 5-and 10-year overall survival (OS) of 44%-50% and 24%-33%, respectively; nevertheless, recurrence rates are high, and only 20% are cured. 1,2 Furthermore, new strategies such as hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) have been associated with better survival, increasing 10-year OS to 38% if used after LR. 3,4 Unfortunately, up to 40%-50% of patients are unresectable at diagnosis, limiting the therapeutic alternatives, [5][6][7] and until recently, the only available therapy was palliative chemotherapy, with a 5-year OS of <10%. 8,9 Moreover, conversion to resectability rates after downstaging with systemic chemotherapy range from 11% to 57% 10 and in combination with HAIP has been shown to be 52% in heavily pretreated patients with an extensive disease burden. 11 However, since a critically important end point to consider in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is complete resection, we cannot ignore the potential presence of disappearing liver metastases (DLM). In this sense, the field of transplant oncology has grown with the ability to offer a total hepatectomy and liver transplant (LT) as treatment for patients with unresectable CRLM (uCRLM), offering 5-and 10-year OS of 75% and 50%, respectively, in a few and very highly selected patients. 12 Despite recent momentum in the field, the treatment of patients with uCRLM remains heterogeneous and center-dependent. In the United States (US), few transplant centers offer protocols, and multimodal treatment sequencing is not well defined. Therefore, despite the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) consensus, each center has adopted unique protocols. 13 Furthermore, when patients are considered unresectable, they are often treated with chemotherapy long before being referred to a center with a LT protocol. Ultimately, this leads to patients who at one time might have been in a window for LT no longer being candidates or the indication being liver dysfunction because of a burned-out liver. Thus, we are facing a dilemma in which a fragmented system, an ill-defined sequencing of treatments, and reluctance to apply this local treatment leave patients without access to every available therapy. In this environment, we hope to highlight recent advances in the field, persistent controversies, and future directions while championing the use of multidisciplinary treatment teams to ensure that every avenue of treatment is considered and personalized care can be better delivered for this population.Before 1995, half a hundred patients were transplanted for CRLM, with 1-and 5-year OS rates of 62% and 18%, respectively, justifying it becoming a contraindication. 14 In 2013, the Norwegian Secondary Cancer (SECA) I proof-of-concept pilot study (N 5 21) demonstrated that patients with uCRLM could achieve 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of 95.7%, 69.6%, and 60%, respectively, and 1year disease-free ...