2016
DOI: 10.1002/pip.2741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The current status and future prospects of kesterite solar cells: a brief review

Abstract: Kesterite-based solar cells are attracting considerable attention in recent years, owing to the reduced toxicity and greater abundance of their constituent elements. In this brief review, we discuss the current status of this important technology by focusing on three key aspects of the device: (i) the interface between the kesterite absorber and the Mo back contact, (ii) the kesterite absorber bulk defects and grain boundaries and (iii) the interface between the kesterite absorber and the buffer layer. By iden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
201
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 333 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
(260 reference statements)
2
201
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects can be equally applicable to CIGS, Kesterite and Perovskite based thin film poly-crystalline solar cells also, 12 Schematic diagram showing the motion of photo-generated charge carriers in a device fabricated with epitaxial layers. The e-h recombination is high in these devices due to lack of separate paths for two different charge carriers since the literature shows their columnar growth patterns [70][71][72]. This effect could also take place in poly-crystalline silicon solar cells when rod-type crystals are formed normal to the wafer surface.…”
Section: Grain Boundary Enhanced Pv Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects can be equally applicable to CIGS, Kesterite and Perovskite based thin film poly-crystalline solar cells also, 12 Schematic diagram showing the motion of photo-generated charge carriers in a device fabricated with epitaxial layers. The e-h recombination is high in these devices due to lack of separate paths for two different charge carriers since the literature shows their columnar growth patterns [70][71][72]. This effect could also take place in poly-crystalline silicon solar cells when rod-type crystals are formed normal to the wafer surface.…”
Section: Grain Boundary Enhanced Pv Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1, kesterite solar cells and particularly Cd&CRM-free devices suffer as well from reduced FF compared to chalcopyrite ones 12,14 . This lower FF is mainly due to a higher series resistance (RS) 64 : state-of-the-art CZTSSe devices exhibit RS~0.7 Ω.cm 2 17 compared to RS~0.3 Ω.cm 2 for CIGSSe devices 31 and a slightly lower shunt resistance (RSh).…”
Section: Mapping Of Fundamental Failures In Cd-free Kesterite Solar Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different review articles have been published to tentatively explain the efficiency limitation of kesterite solar cells [11][12][13][14] . All of them notice first the large VOC deficit (expressed as EG/q-VOC where EG is absorber bandgap and q the elemental charge) of kesterite devices followed by low FF and JSC to a lesser extent similarly as the observation made in Figure 1.…”
Section: Mapping Of Fundamental Failures In Cd-free Kesterite Solar Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…56,57 CZTS based CEs are reported to exhibit better performance than Pt CE. Potential of CZTS for applications in DSSC as CE is relatively new.…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%