2018
DOI: 10.1111/cts.12577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Current Status of Drug Discovery and Development as Originated in United States Academia: The Influence of Industrial and Academic Collaboration on Drug Discovery and Development

Abstract: Academic drug discovery is a vital component to current drug discovery and development environments. In this study, we investigated 798 drug discovery projects that took place between 1991 and 2015 at 36 academic institutions in the United States. The observed success rates of academic drug discovery and development were 75% at phase I, 50% at phase II, 59% at phase III, and 88% at the new drug application/biologics license application (NDA/BLA) phase. These results were similar to the corresponding success ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
94
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the drugs developed by large companies that originate from small companies, including start-ups and academia, may tend to have a higher probability of success. 23 The number of patients was negatively associated with a likelihood of approval (Table 2); that is, designated orphan drugs with fewer patients were more likely to be approved. This may conflict with our general intuition that difficulties in clinical development increase in disease areas with a small number of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the drugs developed by large companies that originate from small companies, including start-ups and academia, may tend to have a higher probability of success. 23 The number of patients was negatively associated with a likelihood of approval (Table 2); that is, designated orphan drugs with fewer patients were more likely to be approved. This may conflict with our general intuition that difficulties in clinical development increase in disease areas with a small number of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the complexity of biomedical research questions has increased, so too has the need to bring together expertise and resources from multiple disciplines and organizations (Cooke et al, 2015). Consequently, several articles by thought leaders have called for more collaboration in the drug development process (Altshuler et al, 2010;Dahlin et al, 2015;Alteri and Guizzaro, 2018;Takebe et al, 2018;Chaturvedula et al, 2019).…”
Section: Drug Discovery Consortiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies may be conducted in people with the target disease if the mechanism of action is specific to the condition, e.g., chronic endobronchial infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with CF (16). Up to 75% of drug candidates move on to Phase II trials (17).…”
Section: Clinical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%