2016
DOI: 10.1214/16-ejp2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cusp-Airy process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in [19,20,2,1,5]. This paper is based and is a follow-up of papers [3,4]; see also [6,9,16,22,23] To find out such a statistics for the lozenge tilings, we first need to determine the correlation kernel for the finite problem, in particular showing that the point process of blue tiles (replaced by blue dots in the middle of the tiles) along the parallel lines, mentioned above, is determinantal, with an explicitly given correlation kernel K blue (ξ 1 , η 1 ; ξ 2 , η 2 ), in the variables η, ξ (to be explained later). For convenience of coordinates, we perform an affine transformation of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…in [19,20,2,1,5]. This paper is based and is a follow-up of papers [3,4]; see also [6,9,16,22,23] To find out such a statistics for the lozenge tilings, we first need to determine the correlation kernel for the finite problem, in particular showing that the point process of blue tiles (replaced by blue dots in the middle of the tiles) along the parallel lines, mentioned above, is determinantal, with an explicitly given correlation kernel K blue (ξ 1 , η 1 ; ξ 2 , η 2 ), in the variables η, ξ (to be explained later). For convenience of coordinates, we perform an affine transformation of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This kernel can be established as a limit of a model of interlacing particles, or rhombus tilings, as discussed in section 5 as was done in [34]. This type of situation was first studied in [66] under the name cuspidal turning point in skew plane partitions but the kernel given there has the wrong contours and no proof was given.…”
Section: Scaling Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the tacnode-GUE statistics [1,4]; it should undoubtedly also lead to Pearcey statistics. Random lozenge tilings of polygons with cuts have led to the Cusp-Airy statistics [29,13]. All of these phenomena appear as result of non-convexities or cuts in the regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, satisfying m 1 + m 2 = n 1 + n 2 and N = b L + c L = b R + c R and c L + d = c R + d , the same limit (14) holds. Here also the limiting kernel L dTac , as in (9), only depends on the width ρ of the oblique strip {ρ } formed by the two cuts, the number r of dots on each oblique line in the strip {ρ }, and β as in (13),where…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%