2007
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200600731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cyclohexasilanes Si6H11X and Si6Me11X with X=F, Cl, Br and I: A Quantum Chemical and Raman Spectroscopic Investigation of a Multiple Conformer Problem

Abstract: The conformers of the monohalocyclohexasilanes, Si(6)H(11)X (X=F, Cl, Br or I) and the haloundecamethylcyclohexasilanes, Si(6)Me(11)X (X=F, Cl, Br or I) are investigated by DFT calculations employing the B3LYP density functional and 6-31+G* basis sets for elements up to the third row, and SDD basis sets for heavier elements. Five minima are found for Si(6)H(11)X-the axial and equatorial chair conformers, with the substituent X either in an axial or equatorial position-and another three twisted structures. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the introduction of a second trimethylsilyl group at position 4 giving heptasilane Si 7 Me 16 (1), which further raises the number of 1,3-interactions, leads to a decrease of the number of predicted conformers to five, with just two of them having relative energies smaller than 6 kJmol -1 . We are confident that these results will not change substantially by using other methods, as the suitability of DFT for the calculation of conformer compositions of methylated oligosilanes has been demonstrated with the systems Si 6 Me 12 and Si 6 Me 11 X, X = H, F, Cl, Br and I [15,16]. Our calculations show that conformers which have a t + t + or t + t -pentasilane subunit with the two SiSiSiSi dihedral angles in the range ±180-150°are lowest in energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Only the introduction of a second trimethylsilyl group at position 4 giving heptasilane Si 7 Me 16 (1), which further raises the number of 1,3-interactions, leads to a decrease of the number of predicted conformers to five, with just two of them having relative energies smaller than 6 kJmol -1 . We are confident that these results will not change substantially by using other methods, as the suitability of DFT for the calculation of conformer compositions of methylated oligosilanes has been demonstrated with the systems Si 6 Me 12 and Si 6 Me 11 X, X = H, F, Cl, Br and I [15,16]. Our calculations show that conformers which have a t + t + or t + t -pentasilane subunit with the two SiSiSiSi dihedral angles in the range ±180-150°are lowest in energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…15 kJ mol –1 ) and Si 6 Me 12 (ca. 16 kJ mol –1 ) 13,14,26. Therefore, a calculation at the aug‐cc‐pVTZ level was not performed for Ge 6 Me 12 in the interest of conserving time (the barrier is 10.0 kJ mol –1 for Ge 6 H 12 at the B3LYP/aug‐cc‐pVTZ level).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic NMR spectroscopic studies for C 6 Me 12 and Si 6 Me 12 gave barriers for the chair‐to‐chair interconversion of 70 kJ mol –1 and 20 kJ mol –1 , respectively 7,12. In two Raman spectroscopic studies of Si 6 Me 12 and Si 6 Me 11 X (X = H, F, Cl, Br and I), we were able to identify chair and twist conformers and to determine their enthalpy differences 13,14. It turned out that boat conformations also represent minima for these cyclohexasilanes, and that the boat‐to‐twist interconversion is fast even on the timescale of Raman spectroscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%