1988
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cytogenetics of Domestic Geese

Abstract: Hybrids were produced between an African male and several Pilgrim female domestic geese. Partial karyotypes revealed a difference in the fourth largest pair of autosomal chromosomes. This chromosome pair was metacentric in the African, submetacentric in the Pilgrim, and heteromorphic in the hybrids. A similar difference between the putative wild ancestors of the African and Pilgrim breeds has been reported by others. These findings provide cytological evidence to support the traditional opinion that the Africa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the findings of GOLDSCHMIDT et al (2000), ANDRASZEK et al (2007) and WÓJCIK and SMALEC (2007, 2008. Conversely, the W chromosome was metacentric in all populations examined; this result is consistent with the data presented by GOLDSCHMIDT et al (2000), however, it contradicts SILVERSIDES et al (1988), APITZ et al (1995) and SMALEC (2007, 2008) who assigned it as submetacentric. This difference in chromosome nomenclature may be due to some intrachromosomal rearrangements such as addition or deletion of chromosomal segments caused by pericentric inversion (GRIFFIN et al 2007;SHIBUSAWA et al 2004;NANDA et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This agrees with the findings of GOLDSCHMIDT et al (2000), ANDRASZEK et al (2007) and WÓJCIK and SMALEC (2007, 2008. Conversely, the W chromosome was metacentric in all populations examined; this result is consistent with the data presented by GOLDSCHMIDT et al (2000), however, it contradicts SILVERSIDES et al (1988), APITZ et al (1995) and SMALEC (2007, 2008) who assigned it as submetacentric. This difference in chromosome nomenclature may be due to some intrachromosomal rearrangements such as addition or deletion of chromosomal segments caused by pericentric inversion (GRIFFIN et al 2007;SHIBUSAWA et al 2004;NANDA et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…1 was submetacentric in all populations. This finding is consistent with that found in both A. anser and A. cygnoides (SILVERSIDES et al 1988;HIDAS 1993HIDAS , 1999APITZ et al 1995;ANDRASZEK et al 2007;WÓJCIK & SMALEC 2007, 2008. Pair no.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Chromosomes are the carriers of genetic material and chromosome mutations are crucial sources of genetic variation [5], we can use these mutations as markers to determine the specific location of a gene on the chromosome, and its position relative to other genes. For instance, researchers can trace the origins and evolutionary history of livestock [6], and assess the genetic diversity of domesticated animals by comparing chromosome number and structure between domesticated animals and their wild ancestors [7]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%