The cytologic history of 245 patients developing invasive cervical carcinoma

Carmichael, John A.; Jeffrey, John; Steele, H. D.; Ohlke, I.D.

doi:10.1016/0002-9378(84)90774-9

Cited by 62 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Soixante-sept pour cent de ces frottis étaient pathologiques et ont conduit à une évaluation histologique approfondie par biopsie ou conisation. Néanmoins, la sensibilité du dépistage cytologique n'est pas parfaite, avec un taux de faux négatifs de l'ordre de 20 %, amenant le clinicien à devoir décider de la meilleure prise en charge de ces cancers du col découverts en postopératoire [28][29][30][31]. Le traitement d'un carcinome cervical invasif par hystérectomie simple entraîne un risque de récidive supérieur à 60 % [10] et nécessite la mise en oeuvre d'un traitement adjuvant [14,19].…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Prise en charge chirurgicale par voie d'abord cœlioscopique du cancer du col utérin occulte découvert après hystérectomie simple

Vignancour¹,

Narducci

Collinet

et al. 2007

Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionunclassified

Prise en charge chirurgicale par voie d'abord cœlioscopique du cancer du col utérin occulte découvert après hystérectomie simple

Vignancour¹,

Narducci

Collinet

et al. 2007

Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…1,2,8,[11][12][13][14][15]17,20,21 Laboratory error, problems with obtaining diagnostic cells, due to either low shedding rates or the presence of cancer high in the endocervical canal, 6,10 and rapid progression or development of cancer during the interval between smears have all been proposed as explanations for false negative cytology among women with invasive cervical cancer. 11,21 Our study focused on women who had biopsyproven CIS.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cervical Smear Histories of 585 Women with Biopsy-Proven Carcinoma <i>in Situ</i>

Bergeron¹,

Debaque²,

Ayivi³

et al. 1997

Acta Cytologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, a high number of visits may not necessarily indicate higher screening participation particularly if the visits took place to multiple health care providers. A review of 245 women who developed invasive cervical cancer in Kingston, Ontario found that there was no difference in access to the health care system for women who had never been screened or not screened recently compared to women whose screening history was considered satisfactory (Carmichael JA, Jeffrey JF, Steele HD, & Ohlke ID, 1984). In addition, a Manitoba study found that although women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer had fewer Pap tests, their opportunities to be screened were as frequent as women not diagnosed with cervical cancer (Decker KM et al, 2009).…”

Section: Continuity Of Care and Opportunity To Be Screenedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening Invitation Letters

Decker

Turner

Demers

et al. 2013

Journal of Women's Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an invitation letter on cervical cancer screening participation among unscreened Manitoba women 30 to 69 years of age. A cluster randomized trial design was used in which unscreened women (n=31,452) were randomly assigned by the forward sortation area (FSA) of their postal code to an intervention group that was sent an invitation letter (n=17,068) or a control group that was not sent an invitation letter (n=14,384). In order to ensure access to screening, a Pap test clinic was held by a health centre in 20 of the 27 FSAs in the intervention group two to three weeks after the invitation letters were mailed.Six months after the letters were mailed, 1,010 women in the intervention group Using the Behavioural Model of Health Services Use as a theoretical framework, predisposing, enabling, and need factors that might influence screening participation were also included as covariables in multivariable logistic regression Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) models. There was a significant main effect of age group (p<0.001), average household income (p=0.01), area of residence (p=0.01), residential mobility (p=0.05), and access (p=0.001). Interactions between the invitation letter and each iii significant variable were tested. The interaction between the invitation letter and age group remained significant (p=0.02); therefore, the effectiveness of the invitation letter was related to age.Of the 1,451 women who had a Pap test in the next six months, 21 women (1.45%) had a high-grade Pap test result. It is recommended that invitation letters continue to be sent to unscreened Manitoba women 30 to 69 years of age and that other provincial screening programs consider sending invitation letters to unscreened women.iv Acknowledgements

show abstract

The cytologic history of 245 patients developing invasive cervical carcinoma

Cited by 62 publications

References 8 publications

Prise en charge chirurgicale par voie d'abord cœlioscopique du cancer du col utérin occulte découvert après hystérectomie simple

Prise en charge chirurgicale par voie d'abord cœlioscopique du cancer du col utérin occulte découvert après hystérectomie simple

Cervical Smear Histories of 585 Women with Biopsy-Proven Carcinoma <i>in Situ</i>

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening Invitation Letters

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About