1984
DOI: 10.3109/10408368409165783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The DuPhenoype, Serology, and Clinical Relevance

Abstract: In this article, the authors examine the nature of the Du phenomenon through a comprehensive historical review beginning with the initial description of the Du factor in the 1940s. Pertinent developments in serologic testing methods and genetic concepts are described. Evidence of the importance of the Du factor in transfusion and hemolytic disease of the newborn is also presented. Selected articles on the frequency of Du in Caucasian and Negro populations are cited. Finally, the authors review current theoreti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately one‐third of D– Oriental persons are DEL and thus are truly D+. Weak D is more common in individuals with an African background 16 . Detection of the hybrid Rhesus box in African RHD genomes is complex 22,43 .…”
Section: Differences Occurring In Different Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Approximately one‐third of D– Oriental persons are DEL and thus are truly D+. Weak D is more common in individuals with an African background 16 . Detection of the hybrid Rhesus box in African RHD genomes is complex 22,43 .…”
Section: Differences Occurring In Different Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1992, D u was renamed “weak D” (by the 2003 Nobel laureate Peter Agre and colleagues) 10 . A review of relevant publications 11‐26 will give the readers of this Editorial a feeling for the impact of the problems and/or controversies in these areas. More recently, there have been added complexities because of findings concerning weak or partial D at the DNA level 27‐36 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D", though originally used to describe a red cell phenotype involving a weakened D antigen expression only detectable by an indirect globulin test, is also used to refer to the group of D mosaic red cells which lack portions of the common Rh(D) antigen [14,17]. D mosaic individuals whose red cells display a variable reactivity with different preparations of anti-Rh(D) are capable of producing anti-Rh(D) on exposure to normal Rh(D) antigen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability of any of the MoAb to agglutinate red cells from the D" categories DV and DVI is not of major concern in blood-typing, since it is preferable to consider mothers and transfusion recipients of these phenotypes as Rh negative so as to prevent unnecessary exposure to the Rh(D) antigen [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ο κύριος προβληματισμός ήταν αν οι λήπτες μετάγγισης με φαινοτύπους weak D ή οι έγκυες γυναίκες θα ευαισθητοποιηθούν και θα παράγουν anti-D αντισώματα, και αν ερυθροκύτταρα με φαινότυπο weak D μπορούσαν να ευαισθητοποιήσουν έναν RhD αρνητικό λήπτη ή μια έγκυο γυναίκα. Στις περιπτώσεις αυτές, όταν πρόκειται για αιμοδότες με φαινότυπο weak D, αυτοί χαρακτηρίζονται ως RhD θετικά άτομα, ενώ όταν πρόκειται για δέκτες ως RhD αρνητικά [186][187][188][189][190][191][192] .…”
Section: τυποποίηση σε ασθενείς και αιμοδότες των φαινοτύπων Weak D και Partial Dunclassified