2017
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2017.1305301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The daily dynamic potential accessibility by car in London on Wednesdays

Abstract: The map presented in this paper shows the effect of congestion on daily accessibility in the London metropolitan area on Wednesdays. Because of its dynamic nature, it is challenging to both calculate the effects of this phenomenon and to represent it clearly on simple maps. Although we can use many traditional techniques for this purpose, they are usually static, and they may lose some essential information on the effects studied. In this paper, we used two cartographic techniques rarely used in accessibility … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study the authors decided to analyse data on travel times at 8 a.m. However, analyses using GTFS data may be interpreted in many ways (Ting & Church 2010) and presented on highly detailed maps (Stępniak & Goliszek 2017;Moya-Gómez & García-Palomares 2017). Szczecin is a city that has already been analysed in the context of accessibility by means of public transport (Goliszek 2017;Goliszek & Połom 2016;Poelman & Dijkstra 2015;Stępniak & Goliszek 2017;Stępniak et al 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study the authors decided to analyse data on travel times at 8 a.m. However, analyses using GTFS data may be interpreted in many ways (Ting & Church 2010) and presented on highly detailed maps (Stępniak & Goliszek 2017;Moya-Gómez & García-Palomares 2017). Szczecin is a city that has already been analysed in the context of accessibility by means of public transport (Goliszek 2017;Goliszek & Połom 2016;Poelman & Dijkstra 2015;Stępniak & Goliszek 2017;Stępniak et al 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, commercial traffic data providers such as TomTom, Here, and Google also offer aggregated historical and real-time traffic information [21]. Some researchers have used real-time speed data from TomTom and Google to estimate dynamic accessibility or congestion level [21,22]. To exploit the power of citizen science, the crowdsensing approach has been recently used to collect travel data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the increasing number of studies on accessibility, the measurement of accessibility has seen significant progress. In addition to investigating the spatial disparity of accessibility itself, accessibility analyses focused on land use (Hansen, 1959), employment (Shen, 1998), population and economic impacts (Jin, Jiao, Qi, & Yang, 2017;Ozbay, Ozmen-Ertekin, & Berechman, 2003), transport infrastructure development (Hou & Li, 2011;Jiao, Wang, Jin, & Dunford, 2014;Li & Shum, 2001), transport modes (Arranz-López, Soria-Lara, López-Escolano, & Campos, 2017;Moya-Gómez & García-Palomares, 2017;Pérez, Quintana, & Pastor, 2011), human behavior (Neutens, Delafontaine, Scott, & De Maeyer, 2012;Shaw & Yu, 2009), service facilities (McGrail & Humphreys, 2014;Wang, 2012), land value (Giannopoulou, Vavatsikos, & Lykostratis, 2016), and social exclusion (Lucas et al, 2016;Preston & Raje, 2007). Although accessibility has become an important concept that is widely used in various fields, the measurement of accessibility is often operationalized in different ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%