2022
DOI: 10.1017/s014271642200042x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The danger of bilingual–monolingual comparisons in applied psycholinguistic research

Abstract: The pervasive monolingual bias present within many societies threatens the well-being of bilingual children and their families. Unfortunately, such bias is present in much psycholinguistic research as well. Bilingual–monolingual comparisons with methodological approaches upholding monolingual norms are not equitable to bilinguals. We do not need such comparisons to learn more about bilingual use and processing. Instead, psycholinguistic research investigating the impact of different kinds of environments for l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, Leivada et al share how impactful the arbitrary lines of language borders are: Many dialects that could be labeled as different languages are not actually able to be labeled as such due to geographical borders, which complicates the study of those individuals who do speak these varieties. In a piece titled “The danger of bilingual–monolingual comparisons in applied psycholinguistic research” De Houwer (2023, this issue) summarizes years of research on how pursuing monolingualism in bilinguals has direct impacts on the well-being of bilinguals.…”
Section: What We’ve Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, Leivada et al share how impactful the arbitrary lines of language borders are: Many dialects that could be labeled as different languages are not actually able to be labeled as such due to geographical borders, which complicates the study of those individuals who do speak these varieties. In a piece titled “The danger of bilingual–monolingual comparisons in applied psycholinguistic research” De Houwer (2023, this issue) summarizes years of research on how pursuing monolingualism in bilinguals has direct impacts on the well-being of bilinguals.…”
Section: What We’ve Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over half of the world’s population is functionally bilingual ( Grosjean, 2010 , Wolck, 1988 ). Yet, monolingual language development is still considered the norm in various fields of research (i.e., monolingual bias; Barratt, 2018 ; Bhatia, 2017 ; De Houwer, 2023 ; Grosjean, 2008 ). In fact, understanding the development of the bilingual brain is an important topic in developmental neuroscience research ( Byers-Heinlein et al, 2019 , Claussenius-Kalman et al, 2021 , Kroll and Fricke, 2014 , Li, 2015 , Petitto, 2009 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%