2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04077.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dark matter distribution in disc galaxies

Abstract: We use high‐quality optical rotation curves of nine low‐luminosity disc galaxies to obtain the velocity profiles of the surrounding dark matter haloes. We find that they increase linearly with radius at least out to the edge of the stellar disc, implying that, over the entire stellar region, the density of the dark halo is about constant. The properties of the mass structure of these haloes are similar to those found for a number of dwarf and low surface brightness galaxies, but provide a more substantial evid… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

16
281
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
16
281
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the universal cuspy halo density profiles Moore et al 1999;Fukushige & Makino 2001), while in agreement with observations of galaxy clusters, are in apparent Send offprint requests to: M. Samland, e-mail: samland@astro.unibas.ch disagreement with the flat dark matter density distributions inferred from observations in the centres of galaxies (Salucci & Burkert 2000;Blais-Ouellette et al 2001;Borriello & Salucci 2001;de Blok et al 2001). Secondly, the specific angular momenta and scale lengths of the disk galaxies in the cosmological simulations are too small compared to real galaxies (Navarro & Steinmetz 2000b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Firstly, the universal cuspy halo density profiles Moore et al 1999;Fukushige & Makino 2001), while in agreement with observations of galaxy clusters, are in apparent Send offprint requests to: M. Samland, e-mail: samland@astro.unibas.ch disagreement with the flat dark matter density distributions inferred from observations in the centres of galaxies (Salucci & Burkert 2000;Blais-Ouellette et al 2001;Borriello & Salucci 2001;de Blok et al 2001). Secondly, the specific angular momenta and scale lengths of the disk galaxies in the cosmological simulations are too small compared to real galaxies (Navarro & Steinmetz 2000b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…While numerical simulations universally produce a cuspy density profile, observed rotation curves of dwarf spiral and LSB galaxies seem to indicate that the shape of the density profile on small scales is significantly shallower than found in numerical simulations (Flores & Primak 1994;Moore 1994;Burkert 1995;Kravtsov et al 1998;Salucci & Burkert 2000;Borriello & Salucci 2001;de Blok et al 2001;de Blok & Bosma 2002;Marchesini et al 2002;. It seems that the data generally favor logarithmic density slopes close to 0.2 Spekkens et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For disk galaxies, an opposite (negative) tilt M dyn / M 0:7 Ã YM 0:8 Ã ( % À0:2 to À0.3) is observed (see, e.g., Persic et al 1996b;Bell & de Jong 2001;Shen et al 2003;Courteau et al 2007): low-mass disks (and dwarf spheroidals) are the most dark matterYdominated systems ( Persic & Salucci 1988, 1990Persic et al 1996aPersic et al , 1996bBorriello & Salucci 2001). Such a scaling is expected if the properties of disks track those of their dark matter halos: lower mass halos are more compact (Neto et al 2007 and references therein), and it is also well established that lower mass disks experience less efficient star formation (Bell & de Jong 2000;Gallazzi et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%