2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dark Matter Distributions in Low-mass Disk Galaxies. II. The Inner Density Profiles

Abstract: Dark matter-only simulations predict that dark matter halos have steep, cuspy inner density profiles, while observations of dwarf galaxies find a range of inner slopes that are often much shallower. There is debate whether this discrepancy can be explained by baryonic feedback or if it may require modified dark matter models. In Paper 1 of this series, we obtained high-resolution integral field Hα observations for 26 dwarf galaxies with M * = 10 8.1 − 10 9.7 M . We derived rotation curves from our observations… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(138 reference statements)
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HI kinematics, stellar kinematics, and photometry each give a different answer (van der Marel & Kallivayalil 2014)). Dwarf galaxies are often irregularly shaped, and also often exhibit cored density profiles (Moore 1994;Relatores et al 2019). This is the case in our simulated galaxies as well, as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Remaining Off-centersupporting
confidence: 77%
“…HI kinematics, stellar kinematics, and photometry each give a different answer (van der Marel & Kallivayalil 2014)). Dwarf galaxies are often irregularly shaped, and also often exhibit cored density profiles (Moore 1994;Relatores et al 2019). This is the case in our simulated galaxies as well, as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Remaining Off-centersupporting
confidence: 77%
“…6 extends the analysis to the full ensemble, showing the median ratios of subhalo mass (m with disc /m no disk ), maximum circular velocity (m with disc /m nodisk ), subhalo concentration (c 2,with disc /c 2,no disc ), and logarithmic inner density slope (s 38,with disc /s 38,no disc ), as functions of the minimum host-centric distance measured in the simulations with disc, r min , of massive surviving satellites in all of the 100 realizations. Here, for the density slope we follow the convention in observational studies to measure it at fixed physical aperture (as opposed to a relative aperture of 0.01l vir that is convenient for theoretical studies) -in particular, we use the average slope between l = 0.3 kpc and 0.8 kpc, s 38 ≡ − ln[ρ(0.8 kpc)/ρ(0.3 kpc)]/ln(0.8/0.3), following Relatores et al (2019). On average, the disc decreases the subhalo mass by up to 60%, v max by 20%, concentration by 5%, and steepens the density slope by 8%.…”
Section: Effect Of the Disc Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with α ∼ −1 (Dubinski & Carlberg 1991;Navarro, Frenk & White 1997;Navarro et al 2004), while observations of some dark matter dominated galaxies appear to suggest profiles are better described by constant density cores at small radii, i.e. α ∼ 0 (Flores & Primack 1994;Moore 1994;Salucci & Burkert 2000;Swaters et al 2003;Gentile et al 2004;Spekkens, Giovanelli & Haynes 2005;Walter et al 2008;Oh et al 2011;Relatores et al 2019). Another potentially related discrepancy is called the Too Big to Fail problem (Boylan-Kolchin, Bullock & Kaplinghat 2011): Milky Way satellite galaxies are observed to have much smaller inner dark matter densities compared to the surplus of subhaloes predicted from [dark matter only (DMO)] cosmological N-body simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%