2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3416023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dark Side of Bank CEO Risk-taking Incentives: Evidence from Bank Lending Decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the partisan (6) (lnEPU) t = c + a 1 (lnEPUCAN) t + a 2 (VIX) t + a 3 (GDPgr) t + a 4 (GDPgap) t + u t 8 In the change regression (model 3 of Panel A in Table 6) we do not include firm fixed effects as these are wiped out by construction in such a regression. Ho et al (2018) posit that the change regression is also a good robustness test for the firm fixed effects regression because the former is free from bias stemming from firm-level omitted variables that are constant over time. In the other specifications of Panel A in Table 6 (models 1 and 2) we include firm fixed effects.…”
Section: Two-stage Least Squares Instrumental Variable (2sl-iv) Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the partisan (6) (lnEPU) t = c + a 1 (lnEPUCAN) t + a 2 (VIX) t + a 3 (GDPgr) t + a 4 (GDPgap) t + u t 8 In the change regression (model 3 of Panel A in Table 6) we do not include firm fixed effects as these are wiped out by construction in such a regression. Ho et al (2018) posit that the change regression is also a good robustness test for the firm fixed effects regression because the former is free from bias stemming from firm-level omitted variables that are constant over time. In the other specifications of Panel A in Table 6 (models 1 and 2) we include firm fixed effects.…”
Section: Two-stage Least Squares Instrumental Variable (2sl-iv) Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the change regression (model 3 of Panel A in Table6) we do not include firm fixed effects as these are wiped out by construction in such a regression Ho et al (2018). posit that the change regression is also a good robustness test for the firm fixed effects regression because the former is free from bias stemming from firm-level omitted variables that are constant over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajan and Winston (1995) indicate that lenders use loan covenants to enhance the ex-post monitoring of changes in loan quality. Also, recent debt covenant literature has suggested that banks with more market risk are likely to use fewer/looser covenants in their loan contracts (e.g., Berger et al, 2017;Ho et al, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2019). Therefore, we investigate whether banks decrease their risk-taking by using more debt covenants to monitor borrowing firms following the enactment of UD laws.…”
Section: Syndicate Loansmentioning
confidence: 99%