Humanizing Technology for a Sustainable Society 2019
DOI: 10.18690/978-961-286-280-0.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Data-Driven Business Value Matrix - A Classification Scheme for Data-Driven Business Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since a DDBM's value architecture and purpose, as well as the form of its value-oriented data processing, influence perspectives regarding value realization from data-and since this investigation particularly aims to explore the differences and similarities between these perspectives-the twelve DDBMs of the QM execution phase were clustered in advance into four QM execution clusters (A-D). To form these clusters, the twelve DDBMs were scrutinized according to the following aspects of value realization from data: (a) the DDBMs' main design, purpose, and their forms of value architecture and data processing (Exner et al, 2017;Hartmann et al, 2016) as well as degree of business renewal (Breitfuß et al, 2019;Schüritz & Satzger, 2016); (b) the nature of their data usage to realize value (Becker, 2016;Wamba et al, 2015;Woerner & Wixom, 2015); and (c) the dynamic market and business implications of value realization from data (El Sawy & Pereira, 2013;Förster et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2015). Grounding on these aspects, the twelve DDBMs of the QM execution phase were clustered as follows:…”
Section: Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a DDBM's value architecture and purpose, as well as the form of its value-oriented data processing, influence perspectives regarding value realization from data-and since this investigation particularly aims to explore the differences and similarities between these perspectives-the twelve DDBMs of the QM execution phase were clustered in advance into four QM execution clusters (A-D). To form these clusters, the twelve DDBMs were scrutinized according to the following aspects of value realization from data: (a) the DDBMs' main design, purpose, and their forms of value architecture and data processing (Exner et al, 2017;Hartmann et al, 2016) as well as degree of business renewal (Breitfuß et al, 2019;Schüritz & Satzger, 2016); (b) the nature of their data usage to realize value (Becker, 2016;Wamba et al, 2015;Woerner & Wixom, 2015); and (c) the dynamic market and business implications of value realization from data (El Sawy & Pereira, 2013;Förster et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2015). Grounding on these aspects, the twelve DDBMs of the QM execution phase were clustered as follows:…”
Section: Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded papers that did not fit this study's scope: Purely conceptual papers (see Lambert (2006a), Lambert (2006b), Lambert (2015), Lambert and Davidson (2013), Groth and Nielsen (2015), or Kamprath and Halecker (2012)); papers with a different focus, such as taxonomies for business model development tools (see Szopinski et al (2017) or Szopinski et al (2019a)), classifications of literature (see Burkhart et al (2011)), taxonomies with other analytical objects (see Berger et al (2018) or Hanelt et al (2015)) or other classification types (see Endres et al (2019), Breitfuss et al (2019), or Abdollahi and Leimstoll (2011)).…”
Section: Phase 1: Structured Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tool aims to facilitate idea generation and service design process by providing exemplary components of data-driven services. We evaluated the initial DSCs version in a first design cycle (Breitfuss et al, 2020). Evaluation results of test workshops showed that revising the DSCs in terms of usefulness and usability would improve the tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%