2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01333-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The data revolution in social science needs qualitative research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(p. 452)In response to this crisis, Bennett (2021) envisions a reimagining of the power structures that are often tacit in academic psychology, naming the epistemological assumptions embedded in research hierarchies, and advocating for a revision in the professional development incentive structure. As scholars and as editors, we have championed open science efforts (e.g., Adler, 2022; Wright et al, 2021) and, given the traction these efforts have already had in our field, we agree with Grigoropoulou and Small (2022) that “the data revolution in social science needs qualitative research” (p. 904). Yet Bennett's (2021) concerns about the risks of open science's ascendance have also simmered for us and offer a perspective we wanted to elevate in introducing our Special Issue, even as we pursued open science in constructing the issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…(p. 452)In response to this crisis, Bennett (2021) envisions a reimagining of the power structures that are often tacit in academic psychology, naming the epistemological assumptions embedded in research hierarchies, and advocating for a revision in the professional development incentive structure. As scholars and as editors, we have championed open science efforts (e.g., Adler, 2022; Wright et al, 2021) and, given the traction these efforts have already had in our field, we agree with Grigoropoulou and Small (2022) that “the data revolution in social science needs qualitative research” (p. 904). Yet Bennett's (2021) concerns about the risks of open science's ascendance have also simmered for us and offer a perspective we wanted to elevate in introducing our Special Issue, even as we pursued open science in constructing the issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This group includes oligarchs, defined as ultra-wealthy people who use their fortunes to exert a disproportionate influence on politics-domestic and international. By building on in-depth ethnography with network analysis using "big data" from offshore leaks, our investigation answers recent calls to leverage synergies between qualitative and quantitative research [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our analysis of these "oligarch networks" provides the first quantitative test of two key implications from prior ethnographic research [24] on the offshore fortunes of high-net-worth individuals. This group includes oligarchs, defined as ultra-wealthy people who use their fortunes to exert a disproportionate influence on politics-domestic and international.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Harnessing techniques for data reduction and pattern recognition, this scholarship leverages computational models as means for generating “insight[s] about what to look for in the data and how to theorize what is being observed”. (Baden et al 2021; Grigoropoulou and Small 2022). Arguably most prominent among these, the program of computational grounded theory (CGT) developed by Laura K Nelson (2020) and the framework of computational ethnography proposed by Corey Abramson et al (2018) demonstrate the exceptional payoffs of this strategy, tying the rigorous study of digital textual data to fine-grained qualitative explorations of patterns, mechanisms, and causality (Edelmann et al 2020; Karell and Freedman 2019; Nelson 2020, 2021a, 2021b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%