American Journal of Ancient History 2017
DOI: 10.31826/9781463237547-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Date of the Battle of Kos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…61 The dating of the battle near the coast of Kos is a subject of an ongoing debate; the most likely suggestions are 261 or 255, cf. Tarn 1909;Bikerman 1938: 371;Peremans 1939;Heinen 1972: 193-197;Buraselis 1982: 146-151;Reger 1985;Hammond -Walbank 1988: 595-599. This is written with an assumption that the battle of Kos took place in the 250s, since no additional information exists about Antigonus Gonatas' involvement in the conflict.…”
Section: Tomasz Grabowskimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61 The dating of the battle near the coast of Kos is a subject of an ongoing debate; the most likely suggestions are 261 or 255, cf. Tarn 1909;Bikerman 1938: 371;Peremans 1939;Heinen 1972: 193-197;Buraselis 1982: 146-151;Reger 1985;Hammond -Walbank 1988: 595-599. This is written with an assumption that the battle of Kos took place in the 250s, since no additional information exists about Antigonus Gonatas' involvement in the conflict.…”
Section: Tomasz Grabowskimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars place the battle in context of the ending of the Khremonidean War, c. 262 (Bikerman 1938;Heinen, 1972, 193-197;Will 1979, 224-226;Walbank 1982, 220f. ;Reger 1985Reger [1993), while others in context of the II Syrian War, c. 255 (Ferguson 1911, 188-191;Tarn 1928 it leaves the question concerning the battle itself open; for the expression μετά τε τὴν Ἀντιγόνου ναυμαχίαν does not specify whether Antigonos won or lost the battle. As mentioned before, the historical setting, and the context of the whole passage favours the first rather than the second possibility; still, the vagueness of the original text should not be ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turning point that in fact confirms this interpretation comes in the beginning of the next sentence -"ἀλλ' οὖν ὅμως"; an emphatic phrase that expresses clearly the contrast with what was said before (cf. Reger 1985Reger [1993, 166). Furthermore, it is in this sentence that we finally encounter the expected "official delegation" (ἐπρέσβευσε), which is in fact the object of the contrast -even though he did not wish to meet Antigonos, nor did he seek personal benefits from the potential friendship with him, nevertheless, for the sake of his native Pitane, Arkesilaos did indeed go as an official envoy to Demetrias where he met the king.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations