1995
DOI: 10.1179/033443595788194142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Date of the Settlement of the Philistines in Canaan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the first, the Philistines settled in the early twelfth century BC, during the last phase of Egyptian domination of the region (Mazar 1985; Stager 1995; Sherratt 2006). According to the second, the Philistines settled after the collapse of Egyptian rule, as ‘monochrome pottery’, unanimously regarded as representing the initial phase of Philistine settlement, is absent from strata with Egyptian 20 th dynasty finds (Finkelstein 1995; Ussishkin 2007). Stratum VIIB at Tel Miqne (biblical Ekron) – the type‐stratum for the early phase of Philistine settlement (Dothan and Zukerman 2004) – is radiocarbon dated to 1125–1050 BC (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the first, the Philistines settled in the early twelfth century BC, during the last phase of Egyptian domination of the region (Mazar 1985; Stager 1995; Sherratt 2006). According to the second, the Philistines settled after the collapse of Egyptian rule, as ‘monochrome pottery’, unanimously regarded as representing the initial phase of Philistine settlement, is absent from strata with Egyptian 20 th dynasty finds (Finkelstein 1995; Ussishkin 2007). Stratum VIIB at Tel Miqne (biblical Ekron) – the type‐stratum for the early phase of Philistine settlement (Dothan and Zukerman 2004) – is radiocarbon dated to 1125–1050 BC (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main Egyptianized strata of south‐western Canaan which can safely be dated to the early twentieth Dynasty (Lachish VI, Tel Mor V and Tel Sera’ IX) have not yielded any Monochrome pottery. The opposite is also true: the principal strata of the Philistine settlement (Ashdod XIII, Ashkelon XVII and Ekron VII) have not yielded any significant Egyptian/ized assemblages (Ussishkin ; Bietak ; Finkelstein ; ; Dothan , 153 for Ekron; Martin for Ashkelon). Indirect Egyptian involvement in the process is just as difficult to substantiate.…”
Section: The Traditional Philistine Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This view, Finkelstein's ‘Low Chronology’ (, 213–39; , 180; ; see also Ussishkin , 240–67), introduced an intense chronological debate (Dothan , 145; Mazar ; , 19 with references; ) and initiated an ambitious radiocarbon dating project intended to resolve the chronological disputes (Boaretto et al . ; Sharon et al .…”
Section: The Traditional Philistine Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the exact timing (e.g. Dothan 1982; Mazar 1992; Finkelstein 1995; 2000; Bunimovitz and Faust 2001) and process (cf. Stager 1995; 1998; Sweeney and Yasur‐Landau 1999; Yasur‐Landau 2003; Barako 2003) of their settlement, as well as their social and ethnic composition and place(s) of origin(s) (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dothan 1982; Dothan and Dothan 1992; Bunimovitz 1990; A. Mazar 1986; Barako 2003; Finkelstein 1995; 2000; Singer 1988; 1994; Stager 1995; 1998; Yasur‐Landau 2003; Sweeney and Yasur‐Landau 1999; see also Sherratt 1998; Bauer 1998; Barako 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%