1992
DOI: 10.1037/h0094348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The day-residue and dream-lag effects: A literature review and limited replication of two temporal effects in dream formation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in keeping with both the day residue (Freud, 1900;Nielsen & Powell, 1992;Powell, Nielsen, Cheung, & Cervenka, 1995), and dream lag (Blagrove et al, 2011a(Blagrove et al, , 2011bNielsen, Kuiken, Alain, Stenstrom, & Powell, 2004) effects. Analyses in the present study illustrated the predominance of waking-life interpersonal relationships being represented in dreams, and to a lesser extent but still common waking-life concerns about work or studying, but financial worries in dreams were relatively rare.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This is in keeping with both the day residue (Freud, 1900;Nielsen & Powell, 1992;Powell, Nielsen, Cheung, & Cervenka, 1995), and dream lag (Blagrove et al, 2011a(Blagrove et al, , 2011bNielsen, Kuiken, Alain, Stenstrom, & Powell, 2004) effects. Analyses in the present study illustrated the predominance of waking-life interpersonal relationships being represented in dreams, and to a lesser extent but still common waking-life concerns about work or studying, but financial worries in dreams were relatively rare.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The characteristic distribution of the results for the last week before the occurrence of the dream is consistent with the results of numerous studies (e.g., Nielsen & Powell, 1992;Marquardt et al, 1996;Nielsen et al, 2004). Such results can be linked to a common mistake that results from referring to an external week scale, a mistake that people frequently make when they try to arrange the time of previous events (Stawiska, 2000;after: Maruszewski 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A number of studies (e.g., Nielsen & Powell, 1992;Marquardt, Bonato, & Hoffmann, 1996;Blagrove et al, 2011) on temporal characteristics of dreams pointed to the existence in dreams a significant representation of recent events, especially from the previous day (the so-called day-residue effect) and events that occured one week before (the so-called dream-lag effect). According to the SMS theoretical model, during dreaming information that pertain to personal goals become integrated into the structures of the autobiographical knowledge, which, when the person is awake, can be difficult to accomplish, due to the engagement of the SMS in conscious processes of monitoring the reality (Horton et al, 2009).…”
Section: Temporal Characteristic Of Dreamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…collection, this low rate may also be attributed to the delay in Awakenings are carried out approximatively 8 min after the the incorporation of presleep experiences which had been onset of REM periods. Recorded reports are transcribed for observed in other instances (for example, Cartwright et al subsequent analysis with no indices of subject and condition 1969; Nielsen & Powell 1992) and particularly in the coloured identification. goggles study of Roffwarg et al (1978).…”
Section:  Dream Content Rem Sleep Visual Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation that help during the experimentation, David Foulkes and Nancy this may be a manifestation of delayed inclusion of presleep Kerr for their comments on this manuscript. experiences in dreams (Jouvet 1979;Nielsen & Powell 1992) is undermined by the distribution of the incorporations across the experimental periods. It should be recalled that most of REFERENCES the incorporations occurred during the first of two nights of Allen, S.R., Oswald, I., Lewis, S. and Tagney, J.…”
Section: Acknowledgements Incorporations Of Visual Inversions By Onlymentioning
confidence: 99%