2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Daya Bay and T2K results on sin22θ13 and non-standard neutrino interactions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of NSI has also been considered to reconcile the measured value of θ 13 in reactor experiments and T2K [157]. In that case, it is suggested that CC-NSI in the neutrino production and detection processes may be responsible for the different values of the reactor mixing angle measured in Daya Bay and T2K.…”
Section: Nsi In Long-baseline Neutrino Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The presence of NSI has also been considered to reconcile the measured value of θ 13 in reactor experiments and T2K [157]. In that case, it is suggested that CC-NSI in the neutrino production and detection processes may be responsible for the different values of the reactor mixing angle measured in Daya Bay and T2K.…”
Section: Nsi In Long-baseline Neutrino Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is important to notice that, besides the need for more restrictive bounds on NSI parameters, it is also necessary to solve the possible confusion between standard and non-standard parameters. As has been stated in the past [36], it is possible to have a confusion in neutrino oscillation experiments between NSI parameters and standard mixing angles, especially 13 q ; recently, this subject has been discussed in the context of solar [131] and reactor neutrinos [78,79]. The significant progress in improving the precision on 13 q will strongly restrict this possibility in the near future.…”
Section: Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[7][8][9]) and with more phenomenological approaches, constraining their relative size with different experimental setups (see, e.g., refs. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]). Although constructing (SU(2) L ×U(1) Y gaugeinvariant) models with large neutrino NSI and consistent with all current experimental constraints, mainly from charged-lepton flavor-violating processes, requires a certain amount of fine-tuning [9], they cannot be completely excluded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%