2005
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-23-1199-2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dayside high-latitude trough under quiet geomagnetic conditions: Radio tomography and the CTIP model

Abstract: Abstract. The dayside high-latitude trough is a persistent feature of the post-noon wintertime auroral ionosphere. Radio tomography observations have been used to map its location and latitudinal structure under quiet geomagnetic conditions (K p ≤2) near winter solstice. The trough is also a clear feature in the ion density distribution of the Coupled Thermosphere-Ionosphere-Plasmasphere model (CTIP) under similar geophysical conditions. Comparisons of the measured and modelled distributions show that the plas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of the width of the tongue show that the modeled TOI (in both runs) covers a larger latitude range than that observed, but it must be borne in mind that the latitudinal dimension of the grid cells of the model is 2° while that of the observations is 0.25°. It has been shown in other studies comparing CTIP model output to observations [ Pryse et al , 2005], that the precipitation input is slightly too high and this would account for the differences in densities between the model run which includes the precipitation and the observations. These predictions, along with the EISCAT results lead us to the conclusion that the in situ precipitation played very little part, if any, in the production of the poleward trough wall observed in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparisons of the width of the tongue show that the modeled TOI (in both runs) covers a larger latitude range than that observed, but it must be borne in mind that the latitudinal dimension of the grid cells of the model is 2° while that of the observations is 0.25°. It has been shown in other studies comparing CTIP model output to observations [ Pryse et al , 2005], that the precipitation input is slightly too high and this would account for the differences in densities between the model run which includes the precipitation and the observations. These predictions, along with the EISCAT results lead us to the conclusion that the in situ precipitation played very little part, if any, in the production of the poleward trough wall observed in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomography has been used in a recent study to parameterise the location and shape of the trough at midlatitudes over the UK [ Pryse et al , 2006a]. Obviously, both empirical and numerical models are important for predicting the structure of the ionosphere and neither can be used with any reliability if they haven't been verified by comparison with observations [e.g., Pryse et al , 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this scale is quite large, smaller structures are expected to develop within these patches [Hosokawa et al, 2009]. Structure also exists in the region of the high-latitude ionospheric trough that, at least on the dayside, can be located poleward of the Hankasalmi SuperDARN radar location [e.g., Sojka et al, 1990;Pryse et al, 2005]. The poleward edge of the trough can produce an increase in electron density by an order of magnitude in a few tens of kilometers [e.g., Mitchell et al, 1995].…”
Section: Measurement Area Discrepanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuller treatment of the precipitation is outside the scope of this investigation. However, it has a marked effect that needs consideration in future as indicated by Schoendorf et al (1996) and Pryse et al (2005).…”
Section: Comparison Between Model Output and Radiotomography Observatmentioning
confidence: 99%