2017
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-104046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The deadly business of an unregulated global stem cell industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mainstream scientific influencers have argued that uninformed patients and health consumers may be exploited if appropriate regulatory oversight is not imposed and implemented for so-called unproven stem cell interventions. Stronger regulation and oversight, they argue, are needed to protect patients' and consumers' health, mitigate risks, and safeguard informed choice (Regenberg et al, 2009;ISSCR, 2010;McLean et al, 2015;Lysaght et al, 2017).…”
Section: Analytical Perspectives: Medical Knowledge (Making) In the Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mainstream scientific influencers have argued that uninformed patients and health consumers may be exploited if appropriate regulatory oversight is not imposed and implemented for so-called unproven stem cell interventions. Stronger regulation and oversight, they argue, are needed to protect patients' and consumers' health, mitigate risks, and safeguard informed choice (Regenberg et al, 2009;ISSCR, 2010;McLean et al, 2015;Lysaght et al, 2017).…”
Section: Analytical Perspectives: Medical Knowledge (Making) In the Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical commentaries calling for stronger regulation and customer protection around such therapies have multiplied (e.g. Regenberg et al, 2009;ISSCR, 2010;McLean et al, 2015;Lysaght et al, 2017;Sipp, 2017). The success of commercial stem cell businesses suggests that large numbers of health consumers are nonetheless choosing to undergo experimental stem cell interventions marketed online, directly contravening healthcare authorities' advice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is it possible that some pa-tients classified as having a superficial infection did not really have an SSI? The authors used the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for superficial and deep infections, 5 in which local cellulitis, stitch abscesses, and pin site infections are not considered SSIs. Of 58 patients in the superficial infection group, only 2 had surgery to address it, and 9 were managed without antibiotics, which would argue against a true SSI.…”
Section: Antibiotic Prophylaxis For Removal Of Lower Leg Orthopedic Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that after intravenous administration of MSCs, they are initially trapped in the lungs (Fischer et al, 2009;Eggenhofer et al, 2012;Prologo et al, 2016). Intravenous infusion of ASCs is safe (Ra et al, 2011a;Ra et al, 2011b;Kang and Park, 2014), but cryopreserved or freshly thawed cells may cause a potential risk of pulmonary embolism, oedema, and even death (Furlani et al, 2009;Cyranoski, 2010;Jung et al, 2013;Tatsumi et al, 2013;Lysaght et al, 2017). It could be provoked by the aggregate formation in blood vessels as well as the response of the complement and immune system to infused ASCs (Eggenhofer et al, 2014;Moll and Le Blanc, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%