“…I think that a closer investigation of this question requires, on the one hand, that we take up again the distinction in Winnicott between the notions of instinct, truly biological pressures which, elaborated imaginatively, demand action (Winnicott, , p. 57), and the notion of drive in Freud, a conventional concept, an abstract idea, a myth, for which Freud's pedagogical effort provides an intuitive analogical content, by stating that it is a border concept between the somatic and the psychic (cf. Armeangou, ; Assoun, , pp. 387–9; Fulgencio, ); and, on the other, that we distinguish, as Girard has done, between ego‐needs and id‐needs, which I take as synonyms for instinctual needs, and the development of these needs.…”