2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00424.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The debate about density dependence – a polemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Method 5: results with different letters in superscript denote significant differences and rank for best fitting curve (a definition. While the debate on the consequences of density dependence for host population dynamics continues (Godfray & Hassell 1997;Haak 2002;Berryman 2003), the statistical definition and quantification of densitydependent relationships remain fundamental to the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method 5: results with different letters in superscript denote significant differences and rank for best fitting curve (a definition. While the debate on the consequences of density dependence for host population dynamics continues (Godfray & Hassell 1997;Haak 2002;Berryman 2003), the statistical definition and quantification of densitydependent relationships remain fundamental to the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, uncertainty has prevailed elsewhere and particularly in insect species, where little evidence for density dependence has been observed in field populations (Andrewartha & Birch, 1954;Dempster, 1983;Stiling, 1987Stiling, , 1988. The lack of empirical support for density dependence in insect species culminated in long-standing debates between entomologists in the late 1980s and mid-1990s (Andrewartha & Birch, 1954;Dempster, 1983;Gaston & Lawton, 1987;Stiling, 1987Stiling, , 1988, appearing to end with an 'agreement to disagree' (Wolda et al, 1994;Haak, 2002). Some authors deduced that density dependence does not occur in insect populations (Dempster, 1983;Stiling, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In actuality, the observed populations are regulated about some mean level and this leads to a stationary probability distribution of population densities ( Turchin, 1995 ) where the variance of population density is bounded. Haak (2002) has argued that ecological density dependence is not a necessary or required concept and that due to methodological developments only statistical density dependence is of importance. Here, the role of statistical density dependence has been evaluated; this provides evidence that the populations are regulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%