2019
DOI: 10.17583/rimcis.2019.4134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Debate of Minimizing Subjectivity in Gender Studies: A Critical Analysis

Abstract: The social sciences have always been contested on the philosophical and ethical grounds of producing scientific knowledge. Similarly, the standpoints of Gender studies are analytically linked to certain domains of reasoning for human behavior. It discusses social phenomena from a societal and cultural perspective, which raises questions for the scholars of this subject about the application of particular procedures for understanding realities guided by some ideologies (Söderlund & Madison, 2017). This arti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A particular concern is the consistency and equity of appraisal ratings, which may be distorted by gender, ethnicity and the ratings of appraisers themselves. Studies have highlighted subjectivity in terms of gender (Nadeem, 2019;Soderlund and Madison, 2017) and ethnicity of the appraisee and appraiser (Chong, 2011). Suggestions and solutions for resolving bias will be reviewed later.…”
Section: Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular concern is the consistency and equity of appraisal ratings, which may be distorted by gender, ethnicity and the ratings of appraisers themselves. Studies have highlighted subjectivity in terms of gender (Nadeem, 2019;Soderlund and Madison, 2017) and ethnicity of the appraisee and appraiser (Chong, 2011). Suggestions and solutions for resolving bias will be reviewed later.…”
Section: Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%