1965
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(65)90328-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The decay of 12.9 d Cs136

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two new levels seen in this work are those at 2356.6 and 2373.7 keV. For discussions of the other levels, we refer thy reader to previous works on this nucleus [2][3][4][5][6][7]. The 2374-keV level decays by four gamma rays rays with a total intensity of 0.21, which gives a log-ft value of 8.0 for beta decay to this level.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Decay Schemementioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The two new levels seen in this work are those at 2356.6 and 2373.7 keV. For discussions of the other levels, we refer thy reader to previous works on this nucleus [2][3][4][5][6][7]. The 2374-keV level decays by four gamma rays rays with a total intensity of 0.21, which gives a log-ft value of 8.0 for beta decay to this level.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Decay Schemementioning
confidence: 95%
“…They include decay scheme studies of 136La E5, 6], neutron capture gamma-ray studies [8,12], and reaction spectroscopy studies [7]. Except for our initial report [3], no new data have been added on the decay of 136Cs since Reising and Pate [2], except for the note of Frana et al [4]. The gamma-ray spectrum detected from the decay of 136Cs cannot be improved over that given by these authors using ordinary singles gamma-ray spectroscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Q * β − value for this transition can be deduced from the sub-keVprecision energy-level E * data in [32] and the gs-to-gs Q value of 2548.2 (19) keV from AME2020 [33]. The gs-to-gs Q value of 136 Cs in AME2020 is evaluated primarily using data from two 136 Cs(β − ) 136 Ba-decay experiments performed more than 60 years ago [34,35]. Previous studies have already demonstrated that Q values derived in indirect methods, such as decay spectroscopy, show large discrepancies with those from direct mass measurements and can be inaccurate over a wide range of mass numbers [20,36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%