2009
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
122
5
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
122
5
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2008, Larivière and colleagues took a fresh look at the Web of Science and reported not only that uncitedness was lower than believed, but also that the percentage of uncited papers had been falling for decades 4 . Nature asked Larivière, together with Cassidy Sugimoto at Indiana University Bloomington, to update and elaborate on that analysis for this article.…”
Section: Myths Of Uncitednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, Larivière and colleagues took a fresh look at the Web of Science and reported not only that uncitedness was lower than believed, but also that the percentage of uncited papers had been falling for decades 4 . Nature asked Larivière, together with Cassidy Sugimoto at Indiana University Bloomington, to update and elaborate on that analysis for this article.…”
Section: Myths Of Uncitednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While citation metrics are commonly used in LIS bibliometric analysis, non-citation rates vary enormously by field. According to Larivière et al (2009), 32% of articles in the social sciences are not cited, compared with 82% for the humanities. As mentioned previously, current survey results indicated that 69.78% of reported publications had not been cited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we also acknowledge the limitations of the IF. 5 The value of the IF is affected by sociological and statistical factors. Sociological factors include the subject area of the journal, the type of journal (letters to editor, papers, reviews), and the average number of authors per paper (which is related to subject area).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%