The Decline of Egoism

Abstract

Sidgwick saw egoism as important and undefeated. Not long afterward, egoism is largely ignored. Immediately after Sidgwick, many arguments were given against egoism – most poor – but one argument deserves attention as both influential and plausible. Call it the “grounds objection.” It has two strands. It objects that there are justifying reasons for action other than that an action will maximize my self-interest. It also objects that sometimes, what makes an action right is a fact other than its maximizing my self-interest. I briefly explain and criticize many of the arguments given against egoism in the period, then explain and defend the grounds objection.

Reflexões sobre as controvérsias do modelo stakeholders capitalism como fator de criação de valor na cadeia da carne bovina brasileira:

“…Ultimately, ethical selfishness is the result of moral disregard of power groups for other agents so that the dominant agent normally seeks to carry out actions that maximize only his own interest, to the detriment of others involved (SHAVER, 2019). From this situation comes Denning's (2020) criticism of the Davos Manifesto (WEF, 2020) for considering that the conflicting demands of different stakeholders lead to confusion, especially in the interests of external agents.…”

The Six Critical Determinants That May Act as Human Sustainability Boundaries on Climate Change Action

“…The Hobbesian apology of self-interest opened the way for the development of utilitarianism and the economic theory of Adam Smith [67], spearheading the success of mainstream economics. Ethical egoism and rational egoism are two forms of normative egoism [68]. The critical question that separates the utilitarian morality of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill [69,70] from normative egoism is the extent to which maximizing an agent's self-interest maximizes the self-interest of other agents.…”