2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The decline of water hyacinth on Lake Victoria was due to biological control by Neochetina spp.

Abstract: There has been some debate recently about the cause of the decline of water hyacinth on Lake Victoria. While much of this evidence points to classical biological control as the major factor, the El Niño associated weather pattern of the last quarter of 1997 and the first half of 1998 has confused the issue. We argue first that the reductions in water hyacinth on Lake Victoria were ultimately caused by the widespread and significant damage to plants by Neochetina spp., although this process was increased by the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But we clearly observed that the positive results occurred only due to biocontrol agents. The similar effects has been discussed in Lake Victoria and they concluded without biocontrol weevils water hyacinth would not have been controlled (Wilson et al, 2007) . The studies indicated the potential role of Neochetina spp.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But we clearly observed that the positive results occurred only due to biocontrol agents. The similar effects has been discussed in Lake Victoria and they concluded without biocontrol weevils water hyacinth would not have been controlled (Wilson et al, 2007) . The studies indicated the potential role of Neochetina spp.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The biocontrol of water hyacinth in pond, river and dams has been a successful method employing weevils in various counties (Abjar and Bashir, 1984;Aguilar et al, 2003;Center et al, 1999a;Center and Dray Jr, 1992;Ochiel et al 2001;Wilson et al, 2007). The impact of Neochetina bruchi and Neochetina eichhorniae were monitored every month in the experimental site (Kadapokathi village) and control site (Vallukam parai) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control of water hyacinth depends on the age of the plants, habitat, flooding, climatic conditions and nutrients especially nitrates and phosphates. "Biocontrol has been successful in tropical countries such as Papua New Guinea [200], Malawi [201], Lake Victoria [202,203], where only N. eichhorniae and N. bruchi were released" [15]. In Benin control by N. eichhorniae was substantial but not satisfactory [204,205].…”
Section: Biological Control Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hyacinth invasion was in large part managed between 1997 and 1999 through manual removal and the introduction of a weevil (Neochetina eichhorniae). The effects of these management procedures were probably enhanced by an El Niño episode (1997)(1998), during which elevated water levels broke off large hyacinth stands, and where low light conditions (clouds) and rain reduced hyacinth growth (Njiru et al 2002, Williams et al 2005, Wilson et al 2007. Even though the hyacinth bloom was probably triggered by eutrophication, its decline is not a reaction to improved water quality: there are multiple pathways to any single phenomenon.…”
Section: Introduced Species Changed Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%