1978
DOI: 10.1080/03680770.1977.11896543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The deep chlorophyll maximum layer of Lake Tahoe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Slow sedimentation rates of epilimnetic phytoplankton accumulated in the DCL: in lakes where it was found that the dominant species in the epilimnion were also important in the metalimnion and/or in the hypolimnion, slow rates of sedimentation explain this phenomenon (Richerson et al, 1978). In Lake Caviahue the dominant species were found along the water column and the other phytoplankton species were registered below the metalimnion in low abundance (Beamud, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) Slow sedimentation rates of epilimnetic phytoplankton accumulated in the DCL: in lakes where it was found that the dominant species in the epilimnion were also important in the metalimnion and/or in the hypolimnion, slow rates of sedimentation explain this phenomenon (Richerson et al, 1978). In Lake Caviahue the dominant species were found along the water column and the other phytoplankton species were registered below the metalimnion in low abundance (Beamud, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include (1) an increase in the chlorophyll a:cell size ratio at depths where light is scarce, (2) sedimentation of epilimnetic phytoplankton that accumulates in the DCL due to the slow sedimentation rates, (3) predation of phytoplankton in the epilimnion by either zooplankton or by other mixotrophic algae, (4) accumulation of mobile flagellates to avoid predation in the epilimnion and (5) availability of nutrients in the meta-hypolimnion. It is expected that several processes interact to control the distribution and magnitude of the DCL and DCM (Gotsis-Skretas et al, 1999;Richerson et al, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some ciliate species are capable of utilizing a suite of potential prey items (e.g., Fenchel, 1987;Stoecker et al, 1986), and individual dinoflagellate and ciliate species have been shown to be capable of supplementing their nutrition through mixotrophy (e.g., Lessard & Swift, 1985;Stoecker et al, 1987, respectively). Deep subsurface maxima (DCL) are a common feature in large nutrient poor ecosystems (e.g., Richerson et al, 1978;Venrick, 1988). DCLÕs are present in many large lakes (e.g., Carrick et al, 2000;Barbeiro et al, 2001), developing shortly after thermal stratification, the dynamics of which has been well studied in Lake Michigan (see Fahnenstiel & Scavia, 1987b, c).…”
Section: Distribution Of Protozoa In Lake Michiganmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions would favour the growth of certain algae in the upper part of hypolimnion (St. Amand and Carpenter 1993). Increased algal densities below the thermocline have been related not only to nutrient availability (Fee et al 1977;Fasham et al 1985), but also to zooplankton grazing (Richerson et al 1978) and grazing-related increased vertical particle flux (Sarnelle 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%