2004
DOI: 10.1086/421994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Deep Lens Survey Transient Search. I. Short Timescale and Astrometric Variability

Abstract: We report on the methodology and first results from the Deep Lens Survey (DLS) transient search. We utilize image subtraction on survey data to yield all sources of optical variability down to 24 th magnitude. Images are analyzed immediately after acquisition, at the telescope and in near-real time, to allow for followup in the case of time-critical events. All classes of transients are posted to the web upon detection. Our observing strategy allows sensitivity to variability over several decades in timescale.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
126
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They place a 95% upper limit on the OA rate of 1.9 deg −2 yr −1 at R = 20. The Deep Lensing Survey (DLS; Becker et al 2004) provides a (less constraining) limit of 5.2 deg −2 day −1 for transients with typical duration of a few ksec and 19.5 < R < 23.4. Malacrino et al (2007) obtained a more stringent upper limit from the CFHTLS Very Wide survey: excluding that the three transient they find are GRBs (Malacrino et al 2007), an upper limit of 0.24 deg −2 yr −1 down to R = 23 can be placed.…”
Section: Optical Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They place a 95% upper limit on the OA rate of 1.9 deg −2 yr −1 at R = 20. The Deep Lensing Survey (DLS; Becker et al 2004) provides a (less constraining) limit of 5.2 deg −2 day −1 for transients with typical duration of a few ksec and 19.5 < R < 23.4. Malacrino et al (2007) obtained a more stringent upper limit from the CFHTLS Very Wide survey: excluding that the three transient they find are GRBs (Malacrino et al 2007), an upper limit of 0.24 deg −2 yr −1 down to R = 23 can be placed.…”
Section: Optical Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection methods have been optimized for specific variability signals to detect supernovae, microlensing, transits, and other variable sources (e.g. Alard & Lupton 1998;Wozniak 2000;Gössl & Riffeser 2002;Becker et al 2004;Corwin et al 2006;Yuan & Akerlof 2008;Renner et al 2008). An important step to optimising this process is to review the current inventory of variability indices and determine the efficiency level for selecting non-stochastic variations in photometric data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognize that modern CCD observations have significantly higher precision than photographic images from the past. However, our interest is in the possibility of using this largely neglected observational material on the most densely star-studded regions in the sky to harvest astrophysically interesting targets (for which there would be some baseline temporal information) for follow up by present day surveys (Munn et al 2004;Kilic et al 2006;Finch et al 2007;Becker et al 2004). Figure 10 shows the statistical HRD for the VSC sample of 55 × 10 3 stars using the values of (B − V) 0 This figure illustrates how a statistical HRD allows one to classify a star on the probability, from its kinematical properties, that it is a MS I, RG I, WD I, SD II, RG II or HB II star.…”
Section: Construction Of the Variability Sample Catalog (Vsc)mentioning
confidence: 99%