2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-016-9366-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Deficit Profiles of Chinese Children with Reading Difficulties: a Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MA has been found to be both a concurrent and longitudinal predictor of reading in typically developing children (Lei et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2013). Moreover, MA has also been found to be one of the best factors that distinguishing dyslexia Chinese children from their age-matched controls (Shu et al, 2006;Zhou et al, 2014;Tong et al, 2017)., and children with severe reading deficits generally show more sever deficits in MA (Peng et al, 2017). Given the aforementioned property of Chinese, it is not hard to understand why MA has been thoroughly accepted as both a strong concurrent and a longitudinal predictor of Chinese literacy skills (Chen et al, 2009;Yeung et al, 2011;Pan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MA has been found to be both a concurrent and longitudinal predictor of reading in typically developing children (Lei et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2013). Moreover, MA has also been found to be one of the best factors that distinguishing dyslexia Chinese children from their age-matched controls (Shu et al, 2006;Zhou et al, 2014;Tong et al, 2017)., and children with severe reading deficits generally show more sever deficits in MA (Peng et al, 2017). Given the aforementioned property of Chinese, it is not hard to understand why MA has been thoroughly accepted as both a strong concurrent and a longitudinal predictor of Chinese literacy skills (Chen et al, 2009;Yeung et al, 2011;Pan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, some other studies reported inconsistent findings: PA is not a significant predictor of Chinese word reading among beginning readers after controlling for RAN, orthographic skills, and morphological awareness (MA) (Tong et al, 2009;Yeung et al, 2011). A recent metaanalysis of Chinese dyslexia found that the predictive power of PA for reading disability is not stable (Peng et al, 2017). The inconsistencies across these results may be partly due to the recruitment of relatively small samples of dyslexic children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strong relations were found between reasoning, working memory, and three metalinguistic skills in kindergarten children. Reasoning was shown to strongly support the development of metalinguistic processing of typically developing children (e.g., Pammer & Kevan, ; Peng et al, ). Specifically, in Mainland China, Chinese phonological, morphological, and orthographical processing instruction is not often taught until early elementary grades when children systematically learn to use Pinyin (an alphabetic system that aids character learning), to compound characters into words, and to develop copying skills to read Chinese characters (Lau, Li, & Rao, ; Li, Wang, & Wong, ; McBride‐Chang, Chung, & Tong, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there is a rich body of research showing that metalinguistic skills including phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, and morphological awareness are very important in character learning (e.g., Anderson et al, ; Chow et al, ; Hu & Catts, ; Huang & Hanley, ; Lin, Sun, & Zhang, ; McBride‐Chang & Ho, ; McBride‐Chang et al, ; Peng, Wang, Tao, & Sun, ; Ruan, Georgiou, Song, Li, & Shu, ; Song, Georgiou, Su, & Hua, ; Tong et al, ; Zhou, McBride‐Chang, Fong, Wong, & Cheung, ). However, limited and mixed findings still exist regarding whether and which general cognitive skills and linguistic skills taken together may take effects on early character reading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%