2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33203-6_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Definability Abduction Problem for Data Exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concurrently, we are exploring the problem of fixing real ontologies in order to enforce definability when it is known it should be the case (Franconi, Ngo, & Sherkhonov, 2012c). This happens when it is intuitively obvious that the answer of a query can be found from the available data (that is, the query is definable from the database), but the mediating ontology does not entail the definability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrently, we are exploring the problem of fixing real ontologies in order to enforce definability when it is known it should be the case (Franconi, Ngo, & Sherkhonov, 2012c). This happens when it is intuitively obvious that the answer of a query can be found from the available data (that is, the query is definable from the database), but the mediating ontology does not entail the definability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, no schema mapping in DE has a unique inverse, although under certain circumstances there is, among the others, only one inverse with a specific form [10]. The case in which there is a unique target instance for a given source instance under the schema mapping, namely when schema mappings can be transformed into proper view mappings via an abduction process, is analysed in [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%