2017
DOI: 10.22215/timreview1088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Defining Characteristics of Urban Living Labs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
43
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dimensions are i) "platform" (Anttitroiko, 2016;Bollier, 2016;Ojasalo & Tähtinen, 2016;Raunio et al, 2016;Walravens & Ballon, 2013) and ii) "participation approach" (Hossain, 2016;Leminen, 2013;Steen & van Bueren, 2017). The framework demonstrates the differences between collaborative innovation networks in the city context.…”
Section: Towards Third-generation Living Labsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The dimensions are i) "platform" (Anttitroiko, 2016;Bollier, 2016;Ojasalo & Tähtinen, 2016;Raunio et al, 2016;Walravens & Ballon, 2013) and ii) "participation approach" (Hossain, 2016;Leminen, 2013;Steen & van Bueren, 2017). The framework demonstrates the differences between collaborative innovation networks in the city context.…”
Section: Towards Third-generation Living Labsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, Steen and van Bueren (2017) operationalized a definition of urban living labs, which was used to assess 90 sustainable urban innovation projects in the city of Amsterdam. They summarized the characteristics of living labs as four elements: aims, activities, participants, and context.…”
Section: Towards Third-generation Living Lab Network In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations