2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The deformation and failure response of closed-cell PMDI foams subjected to dynamic impact loading

Abstract: The present work aims to investigate the bulk deformation and failure response of closed-cell Polymeric Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate (PMDI) foams subjected to dynamic impact loading. First, foam specimens of different initial densities are examined and characterized in quasi-static loading conditions, where the deformation behavior of the samples is quantified in terms of the compressive elastic modulus and effective plastic Poisson's ratio. Then, the deformation response of the foam specimens subjected to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in by the use of lithium grease, which also acts as the lubricant. Further details on the shock tube used in this work can be found elsewhere [4,24,28,29]. As shown in Figure 2b, direct impact loading is applied using a projectile placed inside the tube at the beginning of the reducing section.…”
Section: Impact Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in by the use of lithium grease, which also acts as the lubricant. Further details on the shock tube used in this work can be found elsewhere [4,24,28,29]. As shown in Figure 2b, direct impact loading is applied using a projectile placed inside the tube at the beginning of the reducing section.…”
Section: Impact Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very first example dealt with concrete spalling tests [26], and was then extended to composites [27] and metals [3,4,19]. Since then, the idea has spread and several groups worldwide are starting to use the technique [13,14,16,17,21,40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for a given parent material, increasing the foam density typically results in higher maximum stress but lower failure strains, although the magnitude of the absorbed energy might be equal for both cases (see Fig. 1) [3,[6][7][8]. Therefore, from a design perspective, there is a compromise between the extent of deformation, strength and the total weight of the structure, in case the objective of the design is set on energy absorption and/or crashworthiness criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%