Inelastic Behaviour of Plates and Shells 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-82776-1_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Deformation of Thin Plates Subjected to Impulsive Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (2.9) was later modified by Nurick and Martin [21] to include loading conditions in terms of impulse (I and impulse density I 0 ) and the geometry of the plate (thickness h and load area A 0 ), resulting in equation (2.10). In order to account for similar geometries and different boundary conditions equation (2.10) was further modified by Nurick et al [21].…”
Section: Theoretical Predictions For Flat Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation (2.9) was later modified by Nurick and Martin [21] to include loading conditions in terms of impulse (I and impulse density I 0 ) and the geometry of the plate (thickness h and load area A 0 ), resulting in equation (2.10). In order to account for similar geometries and different boundary conditions equation (2.10) was further modified by Nurick et al [21].…”
Section: Theoretical Predictions For Flat Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to account for similar geometries and different boundary conditions equation (2.10) was further modified by Nurick et al [21]. For quadrangular plates, of length l and breadth b, a geometry factor β was introduced, the geometric damage number ϕ produced is then written as equation (2.12).…”
Section: Theoretical Predictions For Flat Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…amplitude is sought. Following the previous work by Nurick et al [6] the flexural resistance of the plate was omitted. As shown by Jones [lo], in a clamped rigid -plastic plate the bending resistance is vanisllln!…”
Section: Simplified Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplified methods are the alternative for a numerical approach, providing a first-hand, inexpensive estimate of a maximum Permanent deflection of structures subjected to the uniform impulsive load. Mostly they are limited to the relatively simple structures: beams and plates of a regular shape [1, 6,7,8], but they take into account many important features as strain-rate sensitivity, large displacements, and assume the rigid-plastic behaviour for the material, obeying either von Mises or Tresca yielding criterion. The aim of this work was to compare the results of the numerical analysis, carried out by means of commercial computer code ABAQUS/Explicit V. 5.5, and the results of the simplified analysis by So-called kinematic approach with adequate experimental data available in literature [I].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method assumes a plastic deformation in the shape of a roof top, shown in [28], the …nal equation given in Florek and Benaroya [20] for the plastic model of a clamped plate is…”
Section: Plastic Response Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%