1959
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(59)80068-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The degree of mixing in continuous flow systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
169
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
169
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the reentry or accumulation of solute particles at the lower boundary is not physically realistic for advective flow, this phenomenon permits analytical solutions (8) and (9) to exhibit mean residence times unaffected by dispersion. This is unconditionally correct for closed systems [Danckwerts, 1953;Zwietering, 1959] or equivalently for column experiments where solute particles do not flow upstream and hence cannot reenter the domain once they have exited through the lower boundary.…”
Section: It Is Easily Verified That Substitution Of (2) Into (1) Yielmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the reentry or accumulation of solute particles at the lower boundary is not physically realistic for advective flow, this phenomenon permits analytical solutions (8) and (9) to exhibit mean residence times unaffected by dispersion. This is unconditionally correct for closed systems [Danckwerts, 1953;Zwietering, 1959] or equivalently for column experiments where solute particles do not flow upstream and hence cannot reenter the domain once they have exited through the lower boundary.…”
Section: It Is Easily Verified That Substitution Of (2) Into (1) Yielmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the mixing in the reactive flows behaviour is widely reported in the literature, in particular in the processes that involve NO x [8,9]. The fundamental but simplified approach here considered is based on the description of the mixing process after Zwietering [10]. Comparison between experimental and calculated conversions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jetting leads to fluid elements that have a very short residence time and cause high values of E(t) at t > 0 s. Recirculation leads to fluid elements spending more time in the reactor, yielding middle values of E(t) as elements exit at t ∼ t. Stagnation (dead zones) at the inlet of the reactor cause fluid elements to remain entrained in the reactor for a long time before exiting the reactor at ∼ 2-3 × t at low values of E(t), leading to a long tail in the E curve. These three effects together lead to an E curve that looks similar to that of a CSTR, but mixing in CSTRs is dominated by recirculation, meaning that the local concentration of tracer at the exit is identical to all other locations in the reactor (Zwietering, 1959). Therefore, while tracer tests give a general idea about contacting patterns, CFD visualizes the hydrodynamics, and help model the reactor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%