2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00338.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Deleterious Consequences of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing: Time to Seek Alternate Site Pacing

Abstract: Not only is spontaneous permanent LBBB harmful to our patients, but the iatrogenic variety produced by right ventricular apical pacing during conventional permanent pacing may also be deleterious to some patients. The compelling evidence presented herein cannot be ignored; it may dictate a change of attitude toward right ventricular apical pacing directing our attention to alternate sites of ventricular pacing and avoidance of the right ventricular apex.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
109
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
3
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SPWMD was significantly larger in the RVP (338 ± 20 ms) than in the LVP (-16 ± 14 ms) or control (-5 ± 35 ms) group, whereas QRS duration was similarly longer in the RVP (157 ± 10 ms) and LVP (158 ± 22 ms) groups compared than in the control group (69 ± 7 ms). The authors conclude that LV function in children is preserved by chronic pacing at the LV lateral wall.Keywords Cardiac function Á Children Á Dyssynchrony Á Pacing Á Site Á Ventricular In children and adults with congenital or acquired atrioventricular (AV) block, the ventricular pacing lead is traditionally positioned at the right ventricle (RV) [16,19]. However, RV apex pacing causes an acute decrease in left ventricular (LV) function in animals [26], adults [6] and children [14,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPWMD was significantly larger in the RVP (338 ± 20 ms) than in the LVP (-16 ± 14 ms) or control (-5 ± 35 ms) group, whereas QRS duration was similarly longer in the RVP (157 ± 10 ms) and LVP (158 ± 22 ms) groups compared than in the control group (69 ± 7 ms). The authors conclude that LV function in children is preserved by chronic pacing at the LV lateral wall.Keywords Cardiac function Á Children Á Dyssynchrony Á Pacing Á Site Á Ventricular In children and adults with congenital or acquired atrioventricular (AV) block, the ventricular pacing lead is traditionally positioned at the right ventricle (RV) [16,19]. However, RV apex pacing causes an acute decrease in left ventricular (LV) function in animals [26], adults [6] and children [14,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region of the bundle of His (para-His), the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT) and the septal region (septal) have all been evaluated 28,29 . In Brazil, Jatene and Korman 30 described a technique of implantation in the region of the RV inflow tract as an alternate site in Chagas disease, due to the cardiac structural changes observed at the RV apex in these patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common adverse effects of chronic RVA pacing are: iatrogenically accentuated intraventricular conduction delay, left ventricular electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony, left ventricular remodeling, abnormalities in myocardial histopathology, left ventricular dysfunction (both systolic and diastolic), congestive heart failure, myocardial perfusion defects and regional wall motion abnormalities, functional mitral regurgitation, increased risk of atrial fibrillation (in patients with sinus node dysfunction and normal baseline QRS duration), left atrial enlargement, promotion of ventricular arrhythmias, activation of sympathetic nervous system [4].…”
Section: Adverse Effects Of Rva Pacingmentioning
confidence: 99%