2015
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/i2015-15217-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The deletion-contraction method for counting the number of spanning trees of graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degenerating the graph through successive elimination of contraction of its edges represents the core of another way to compute the complexity of a graph [15,16]. If = ( , ) is a multigraph with ∈ , then ⋅ is the graph obtained from by contracting the degree until its endpoints are a single vertex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degenerating the graph through successive elimination of contraction of its edges represents the core of another way to compute the complexity of a graph [15,16]. If = ( , ) is a multigraph with ∈ , then ⋅ is the graph obtained from by contracting the degree until its endpoints are a single vertex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another class of graphs for which an explicit formula has been derived is based on a prism [13,14]. Many works have conceived techniques to derive the number of spanning tree of a graph, which can be found at [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Now we introduce following Lemma which describes a way to calculate the number of spanning trees by an extension of Kirchhoff formula.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the favorite methods of calculating the complexity is the contraction-deletion theorem. For any graph G, the complexity τ(G) of G is equal to τ(G) = τ(G − e) + τ(G/e), where e is any edge of G, and where G − e is the deletion of e from G, and G/e is the contraction of e in G. This gives a recursive method to calculate the complexity of a graph [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%