1996
DOI: 10.12968/bjtr.1996.3.12.14731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Delphi method: a useful tool for the allied health researcher

Abstract: The Delphi technique is a means of deducing consensus opinion from a panel of experts by means of consecutive rounds of questionnaires with post-round feedback. Sometimes regarded as an alternative to a committee meeting, the Delphi method has been widely used in nursing. It has considerable potential for increased use in allied health research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
148
3
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
148
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The final decision on each item was based not only on the median score of validity and clarity, and the agreement among experts expressed as a percentage, but also on the comments of the experts and the results of the discussions between the experts [14]. The physical meeting, at the end of the two rounds of questionnaires, is very useful when it is difficult to reach a consensus or when uncertainties persist, as was the case for these items; conversely absence of a meeting may deprive the Delphi procedure of benefits related to face-to-face exchange of information, such as clarification of reasons for disagreements or discuss comments [20]. One of the main limitations of this study was the difficulty to properly assess the exact spectrum of the disease of the patients who were included in the DELPHI panel, as some of them were enrolled from a patient association.…”
Section: Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final decision on each item was based not only on the median score of validity and clarity, and the agreement among experts expressed as a percentage, but also on the comments of the experts and the results of the discussions between the experts [14]. The physical meeting, at the end of the two rounds of questionnaires, is very useful when it is difficult to reach a consensus or when uncertainties persist, as was the case for these items; conversely absence of a meeting may deprive the Delphi procedure of benefits related to face-to-face exchange of information, such as clarification of reasons for disagreements or discuss comments [20]. One of the main limitations of this study was the difficulty to properly assess the exact spectrum of the disease of the patients who were included in the DELPHI panel, as some of them were enrolled from a patient association.…”
Section: Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance methodological rigor of the study, researchers have recommended that the response rate for each Round should be approximately 70% [42,43]. The response rate across all the Rounds of the Delphi was good and exceeded the recommended levels described in the literature except in Round 1 where the response rate was 60%.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 We used a modified Delphi method to obtain a consensus of participants' opinions on strategies that are important and feasible for use in the prevention and management of obesity. 10 The process involved these steps:…”
Section: Overall Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%